[This video by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky and Drago Bosnic was first published by Global Research. You can watch it here.]

What prevails in Ukraine is a full-fledged Nazi Government. In February 2014, the U.S. sponsored the Euromaidan coup d’etat in support of two Nazi parties: Svoboda and Right Sektor. The New York Times described the coup as “a flowering of democracy.”

The election of Zelensky (a proxy of US Intel) in 2019 was intent upon acquiring the Russian vote in Donbass. A Russian Jew was transformed into a Nazi. Of course this never made the headlines in the Western media.

In recent developments, the Zelensky “Nazi regime” has officially acknowledged and praised the political and ideological heritage of the infamous Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) aligned with Адольф Алоїсович Гитлер (Adolph Aloisovitch Hitler).

The OUN as well as the Ukrainian Insurgent Paramilitary Army (UPA) played a key role in the Holocaust against Ukraine’s Jewish population.

And our Western heads of State and heads of government have supported the Kiev Nazi regime from the very outset, without batting an eyelid.

Zelensky has also betrayed his family. Many of his relatives were victims of the Nazi Holocaust.

“C’est le monde à l’envers… “

***

Video: Western Support to a Nazi Government in Ukraine

Our longstanding commitment is to world peace and “true democracy.”

Original in English. Click below: subtitles in 16 languages with hyperlinks:

English, Français, عربي, Русский, Español, 中文, Deutsch, Farsi, Português, Italiano, 日本語, 한국어, Türkçe, Српски, Bahasa Malay, ภาษาไทย

Our thanks to Lux Media for their support in the production of the video with subtitles in 16 languages.

To contribute to the GRTV-Lux Media video project, please consider subscribing to my Substack. Click here to see subscription options.

Click here to watch the video with subtitles in 16 languages.

[This video by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky and Drago Bosnic was first published by Global Research. You can watch it here.]

America’s unspoken military practice from World War II to the present consists in routinely targeting civilians, which constitutes a crime against humanity.

When a global military agenda is heralded as a humanitarian endeavor,

When the deliberate killing of children is upheld as “collateral damage,”

When those who resist the US-NATO-led invasion of their homeland are categorized as “insurgents” or “terrorists,”

It becomes clear that since World War II, the targeting of innocent civilians has become the mainstay of U.S. military atrocities.

Remember General Curtis Lemay:

“After destroying North Korea’s 78 cities and thousands of her villages, and killing countless numbers of her civilians, [General] LeMay remarked, “Over a period of three years or so we killed off – what – twenty percent of the population.”

The conduct of massacres of civilians are invariably rewarded. Remember General Colin Powell, who was responsible for the coverup of Vietnam’s My Lai massacre acceded to a “brilliant” career in the Armed Forces, Secretary of State, in the George W. Bush Administration.

Eighty-one years ago, in the words of President Harry Truman,

“The world will note that the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima a military base. That was because we wished in this first attack to avoid, insofar as possible, the killing of civilians.”

Flash forward to June 2026: Drone strikes hit a shared student dormitory at the Starobelsk College (Lugansk), killing 21, mostly young women and teenagers, and injuring 63 others. Silence of the Western media.

***

Video: President Trump and the Pentagon are Targeting Civilians Worldwide

Our objective is to reach out to people worldwide on behalf of our children who are the victims of U.S. military doctrine.

Our longstanding commitment is to world peace and “true democracy.”

Original in English. Click below: subtitles in 16 languages with hyperlinks:

English, Français, عربي, Русский, Español, 中文, Deutsch, Farsi, Português, Italiano, 日本語, 한국어, Türkçe, Српски, Bahasa Malay, ภาษาไทย

Our thanks to Lux Media for their support in the production of the video with subtitles in 16 languages.

To contribute to the GRTV-Lux Media video project, please consider subscribing to my Substack. Click here to see subscription options.

Click here to watch the video with subtitles in 16 languages.

[This essay by Christine Cotton was also published on Global Research. You can read it here.]

It is June 2, 2026. By the time you read these lines, I will have left this world.

For those who do not know me, my name is Christine Cotton.

I am what is known as a whistleblower. I worked for 25 years in the pharmaceutical industry in the management and analysis of clinical data.

As a biostatistician, since December 2020, I have immersed myself in the documents of the COVID vaccine from the Pfizer laboratory. I have written numerous documents and done many broadcasts to share the real results. My conclusions are catastrophic, beyond the invalidity of the results due to errors or even manifest frauds.

The Pfizer vaccine that the population received, that you may have received, is not the one from the clinical trial with the 95% efficacy announced by all the politicians, journalists, and TV doctors. You were administered a product for which there were absolutely no results, neither of efficacy nor of tolerance.

This message is not intended to create sensationalism on social networks but to inform you of one of the biggest manipulations that humanity has ever known.

All the evidence is in the latest version of my work, which I invite you to download and read. For the lazier ones and the very busy, the few pages of the conclusion and the links to the source documents will already enlighten you a great deal.

I fell ill at the very moment I filed a complaint against the health authorities.

For over a year, I have been suffering from excruciating pain starting from the lower back down to my legs, burning sensations in the skin, mainly in the legs and back. I have consulted general practitioners, neurologists, osteopaths, virologists, dermatologists, rheumatologists, psychiatrists, homeopaths… I have swallowed thousands of capsules of dietary supplements, anxiolytics, neuroleptics, painkillers prescribed by the pain center. I have even done bioresonance sessions and seen magnetizers, and this without any result.

I am at the end of what I can bear.

I ask forgiveness from those who love me, you who have followed me on social networks for 4 years, my friends, my parents, and above all to God or whatever his nature or name may be, to end my life—I, who have never ceased to protect it since childhood, whether plant, animal, or human life.

From the bottom of my heart, I thank those who have supported me, encouraged me, and all those who pray or have organized prayer groups. I am going to ask you to pray once more so that my soul may be in the light of the Creator as soon as possible.

***

Click the image below to read Christine Cotton’s latest work:

[This article was first published by Global Research. You can read it here.]

Google’s project to release genetically modified Wolbachia mosquitoes in Florida and California was announced on June 1, 2026. It’s an initiative of Google’s parent company, Alphabet, through its life sciences division Verily.

“Verily has filed for EPA approval to release millions of specially treated mosquitoes over the next two years as part of an effort to reduce disease-carrying mosquito populations.

The initiative is known as the Debug Project, a program that has been researching mosquito control for more than a decade”

The premises as well as the narrative of the Verily initiative are similar to those put forth by Bill Gates and The World Mosquito Program (WMP).

According to Bill Gates in relation to Brazil’s flawed multi-million dollar program to suppress dengue:

“These mosquitoes are allies in the fight against dengue and other deadly viruses.”

“The demand for these lifesaving mosquitoes continues to grow and that means the World Mosquito Program (WMP) needs to produce hundreds of millions of Wolbachia mosquitoes.

This might sound the beginnings of a Hollywood writer’s horror film plot.”

But it’s not. (emphasis added)

The Release of Wolbachia Genetically Modified Mosquitoes in California and Florida

What is contemplated is the release of 32 million Wolbachia genetically modified mosquitoes in Florida and California.

“Google wants to “stop bad bugs with good bugs.”

“As part of its successful “Debug” program, Google is tapping into its tech expertise to raise an army of sterile male mosquitoes to lower the number of illness-spreading bugs. Mosquitoes – the world’s deadliest animal – kill more people than any other creature in the world every year by spreading lethal diseases such as dengue, West Nile virus, Zika, chikungunya and malaria.

… A notice from the federal register shows the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reviewing Google’s request to release up to 16 million mosquitoes annually, in Florida and California, over the span of two years. The EPA will decide whether to greenlight Google’s request for an experimental use permit after a public comment period, which ends on 5 June. (The Guardian)

There is visibly negligence on the part of the EPA to grant Google “the greenlight.” No public comment, no debate among American citizens. “Mosquitoes are our allies.”

Moreover, it should be noted that while the Google-Verily “Experimental Use Permit” was granted by the EPA in December 2025, the “Wolbachia Genetically Modified Mosquitoes” Project was “officially” made public on June 1, 2026, with a deadline for public comment on June 5, 2026.

Once the release of genetically modified mosquitos is authorized, it is virtually impossible for the relevant government authorities and the EPA to monitor or restrict the number of mosquitos released in Florida and California. (See the case of Brazil below).

Genetically modified mosquitoes have been the object of detailed research by prominent scientists and scholars. A Wolbachia genetically modified mosquitoes procedure was applied in 2023-24 in Brazil with a view to reducing “the confirmed cases of dengue.”

“Brazil’s Mosquitos Horror Story”

Something definitely went wrong!

People in Florida, California and across America must take cognizance of The 2023-2024 Brazil “Mosquito Horror Story” whereby the release of 5 billion gene-edited “lifesaving mosquitoes” was conducive (2024) to more than 6.5 million confirmed cases of dengue. (2024: the highest level in Brazil’s history)

The graph below (peer-reviewed scientific report) is revealing: See the 2023-24 dramatic hike in the number of confirmed dengue cases up to more than 6.5 million in 2024.

For details and analysis click here:

The Weaponization of Gene-Edited Mosquitoes. Will It Save Lives?

By F. William Engdahl, Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Jamie White, Amy Mek, and Jordan Schachtel, June 02, 2026

Google to Release 32 Million Bacteria-Infected Mosquitoes into Florida and California

By Nicolas Hulscher, June 02, 2026

[This article by Laala Bechetoula was first published by Global Research. You can read it here.]

“The dead have names. The weapons have serial numbers. The vetoes have timestamps.” — Laâla Bechetoula

Erasure

I was born in Laghouat, at the edge of the Algerian Sahara, in the house of Ahmed Chatta — a man abducted by French colonial forces in 1958 and never seen again. No grave. No body. No official accounting. Only absence.

Colonial systems often erase in two stages. First the body disappears. Then the archive is organized around the disappearance.

I grew up inside that silence.

For that reason, when the first images from Gaza emerged after October 7, 2023, I recognized something immediately. Not the event itself. History never repeats itself mechanically. What I recognized was the grammar: the structure through which an entire population is progressively transformed into a demographic problem, a security burden, an obstacle to be managed, displaced, fragmented, or eliminated.

[Image: Girl in Gaza on her way to get food (CC BY-SA 4.0)]

The vocabulary changes across centuries. The mechanism rarely does.

The destruction of civilian infrastructure.

The separation of populations under different legal systems.

The language of biological threat.

The normalization of mass death.

The bureaucratic management of starvation.

The transformation of entire urban spaces into kill zones.

These are not accidental excesses appearing suddenly in wartime.

They belong to a recognizable historical architecture.

This text is not written as a slogan, nor as an exercise in rhetorical outrage.

It is written as a historical and legal record grounded in publicly documented evidence: United Nations investigations, rulings and provisional measures issued by the International Court of Justice, arrest warrants from the International Criminal Court, humanitarian reports, medical documentation, demographic data, journalistic investigations, and statements made publicly by Israeli officials themselves.

The purpose is not merely to denounce. It is to establish continuity between evidence, language, law, and power.

Future historians will not suffer from lack of documentation regarding Gaza. The quantity of archived material is already unprecedented. The question that will confront future generations is different:

How did the international system continue supplying weapons, diplomatic protection, and political legitimacy while the evidence accumulated in real time?

Differential Humanity

Israel presents itself internationally as “the Middle East’s only democracy.” The phrase has been repeated for decades by Western governments and media institutions as a self-evident truth requiring no serious examination.

But democracies are not ultimately defined by elections alone. Colonial powers also organized elections. Segregationist systems have historically maintained parliamentary institutions. The decisive question is different:

Does the state apply equal legal value to all human beings living under its effective control?

Across the territory extending from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, two populations continue to live under fundamentally different legal realities.

Israeli citizens enjoy civilian law, political rights, freedom of movement, and institutional protections guaranteed by the state.

Palestinians in the occupied territories remain subject to military orders, administrative detention, movement restrictions, land confiscation, permit regimes, military courts, and expanding settlement infrastructures considered illegal under international law.

This dual structure has been documented extensively by major human rights organizations long before October 2023.

In 2021, Human Rights Watch published A Threshold Crossed, concluding that Israeli authorities were committing the crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution.

In 2022, Amnesty International reached similar conclusions in its report Israel’s Apartheid Against Palestinians.

The Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem had already described the governing structure as “a regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.”

These findings emerged before the destruction of Gaza reached its current scale.

The issue, therefore, is not whether October 7 created a new political reality. The issue is whether October 7 accelerated and exposed an already existing structure.

The vocabulary of democracy remained intact internationally.

The underlying legal architecture moved elsewhere.

Elimination

Mass atrocities do not begin with killing. They begin with linguistic preparation.

Before populations are destroyed physically, they are progressively transformed into abstractions, biological threats, demographic dangers, or contaminating presences.

Language performs the moral preparation for violence.

On October 9, 2023, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant announced a “complete siege” on Gaza: no food, no water, no electricity, no fuel. He described the population under siege as “human animals.”

The phrase matters historically.

Not because it is uniquely shocking, but because dehumanizing vocabularies appear with striking regularity across colonial and genocidal systems.

In Algeria, colonized populations were described in military literature as “indigenous masses” requiring pacification.

In Rwanda, Tutsis became “cockroaches.”

In Bosnia, Muslims became an invasive demographic threat.

In Nazi Europe, Jews became vermin and disease.

The purpose of such language is not descriptive. It is administrative and psychological.

Once a population is transformed linguistically into a biological or civilizational threat, extraordinary violence becomes easier to justify publicly.

“There are no innocent civilians in Gaza.”

“Erase Gaza.”

“Voluntary migration.”

“Flatten everything.”

“Humanitarian pressure.”

“Buffer zones.”

The expressions vary. The structure remains recognizable.

Annihilation

Numbers matter historically because they reveal scale. But numbers also conceal.

Every large-scale atrocity eventually produces statistical language: dead, wounded, displaced, missing, orphaned, malnourished.

The danger is that arithmetic begins replacing humanity itself.

As of late 2025, tens of thousands of Palestinians had been confirmed dead in Gaza according to multiple humanitarian and UN-linked estimates.

[Image: Palestinian civilians in Gaza on 29 January 2025 (CC BY-SA 4.0)]

Among the dead were thousands of children.

One of them was Hind Rajab.

She was five years old.

On January 29, 2024, she remained trapped inside a vehicle in Tel al-Hawa surrounded by the bodies of her relatives after Israeli fire struck the car.

Investigators later counted hundreds of bullet impacts on the vehicle.

She was five years old.

Another child, Jinan Iskafi, died from severe malnutrition after shortages of infant formula intensified under blockade conditions documented by humanitarian agencies.

The formula existed outside Gaza.

It did not enter.

Elsewhere, doctors described performing emergency cesarean procedures without anesthesia because medical supplies had collapsed under siege conditions.

These are not metaphors.

They are medically documented realities.

Reprocide

What occurred in Gaza between 2023 and 2026 may require a more precise conceptual vocabulary.

I use the term reprocide to describe the systematic destruction of a population’s reproductive future through direct and indirect means: the targeting of fertility infrastructure, the collapse of maternal healthcare, extreme nutritional deprivation, forced displacement conditions incompatible with childbirth, and the destruction of stored reproductive material.

At Al-Basma IVF Centre, Gaza’s principal fertility clinic, shelling destroyed thousands of frozen embryos and reproductive materials stored for Palestinian families undergoing fertility treatment.

The destruction extended beyond the present generation.

It targeted biological continuity itself.

The Digital Archive

Previous genocides were reconstructed after the fact.

Witnesses testified years later. Archives emerged decades later. Photographs surfaced gradually.

Gaza unfolded differently.

It may become the first large-scale atrocity in modern history documented continuously in real time: by satellites, smartphones, aid workers, journalists, medical staff, drones, surveillance systems, social media archives, open-source investigators, and, at times, by perpetrators themselves.

The world did not fail to see.

The world saw continuously.

Weapons transfers continued during documentation. Diplomatic protection continued during documentation. Vetoes continued during documentation.

The archive and the violence advanced simultaneously.

Impunity

No prolonged military campaign of this scale functions without external systems of supply, financing, diplomatic protection, and strategic shielding.

Since October 2023, the United States has remained Israel’s principal military backer through large-scale transfers of munitions, missile-defense support, logistical coordination, and emergency military appropriations measured in billions of dollars.

Repeated ceasefire resolutions at the United Nations Security Council encountered American vetoes.

European governments adopted a parallel posture: expressions of concern combined with continued strategic cooperation and varying levels of military or industrial support.

Impunity no longer functioned discreetly.

It became visible infrastructure.

Collapse

The post-1945 international order was constructed publicly around several universal claims: human rights, civilian protection, international law, genocide prevention, equal human dignity.

Gaza exposed the fragility of those claims when confronted with strategic alliances.

The deeper crisis concerns selective universality: a system in which legal principles remain fully operational against adversaries yet increasingly negotiable when allies are implicated.

What becomes of international law when enforcement depends primarily on geopolitical alignment?

What becomes of democratic morality when mass death remains tolerable provided it is administered by allied states?

These questions now extend far beyond the Middle East.

They concern the credibility of the international system itself.

The Record

The archive is already immense.

The dead have names. The weapons have serial numbers. The orders have signatures. The vetoes have timestamps.

Future historians will not ask whether sufficient evidence existed.

The evidence is overwhelming.

They will ask something far more difficult:

How did the international system continue functioning normally while the destruction remained visible continuously?

How did legality become conditional?

Hind Rajab. Refaat Alareer. Dr. Adnan al-Bursh. Thousands of unnamed children beneath collapsed concrete.

Their names will remain in the historical record alongside those who authorized, financed, justified, protected, or normalized what occurred.

Archives eventually open. Mass graves eventually speak. The disappeared eventually return through testimony, memory, and documentation.

I learned that lesson in Laghouat, in the house of a disappeared man whose body was never returned.

The record remains open.

***

Laala Bechetoula is an independent Algerian historian, journalist, and geopolitical analyst.

He has been writing on Trump, American hegemony, and the collapse of the international order since 2025.

His work appears in Countercurrents, Global Research, Réseau International, Le Quotidien d’Oran, Sri Lanka Guardian, and other international platforms. This article integrates and crowns a corpus of analytical work produced between November 2025 and April 13, 2026.

He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).

[This article was first published by Global Research in September 2024. You can read it here.]

The first thing which was denied to Palestinians was water and food. It was the onslaught of the genocide against the People of Palestine.

Netanyahu ordered a complete blockade of the Gaza Strip starting on October 9, 2023, preventing and obstructing the importation of clean water, food, fuel, and essential commodities to 2.2 million Palestinians.

Dr. Gerard Delepine in an article entitled Gaza’s Children Don’t Need Polio Vaccine, They Need Peace and Clean Water!, states the following:

“The single case of polio in Gaza triggered a global outcry and an appeal by the UN, which obtained the agreement of the United States and Israel to send 1.2 million doses of vaccine.

But who are we kidding? Why vaccinate children against a disease that can be completely eradicated by drinking water? Clean Water Is Enough to Eradicate Polio”

The first step would be for the self-proclaimed international community to demand the restoration of the import of water and food.

Who are the Architects of Gaza’s Polio Vaccination Program?

While The Guardian, (July 26, 2024) report confirrmed that more than 39,000 people have been killed, 89,000 wounded, it fails to acknowledge the criminal nature of the Netanyahu’s agenda. “… Gaza is facing acute food insecurity and catastrophic hunger. Thousands of children are malnourished, making them even more susceptible to disease.

Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreysus , The Guardian (Opinion) (26 July, 2024) confirms that:

“While no cases of polio have been recorded yet [in Gaza], without immediate action, it is just a matter of time before it reaches the thousands of children who have been left unprotected. Children under five are at risk, and especially infants under two because many have not been vaccinated over the nine months of conflict.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is sending more than 1 million polio vaccines to Gaza, which will be administered in the coming weeks to prevent children being struck down by the disease.”

WHO Director General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreysus confirms that his lifelong mentor Bill Gates generously offered to come to the rescue of Palestinian children. And Netanyahu has granted “the green light.”

WHO Director General Dr. Tedros confirmed that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation would be financing a [“Save the Children”] Polio vaccine (under the helm of the WHO) and in liason with the Netanyahu government.

“Support for the Guardian’s global development journalism [also] comes from the Bill and Melinda Foundation.” [How Convenient. Not a single mention of Netanyahu]

Is There an Unspoken Agenda? One Million Polio Vaccines for Palestinian Children?

I recall the statement by Bill Gates during his TED Talk (February 2010) pertaining to vaccination:

“And if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that [the world population] by 10 or 15 percent.”

According to Gates’s statement, this would represent an absolute reduction of the world’s population (2010) of the order of 680 million to 1.02 billion.

(See quotation on video starting at 04.21. See also screenshot of transcript of quotation)

TED Talk at 04:21:

Click here to watch the video.

When was the polio vaccination for Gaza first contemplated by the WHO-Gates Foundation?

Did the WHO, UNICEF and The Gates Foundation take a stance regarding the blockade of food and water which started immediately in October 2023, and which is categorized in international law as a criminal undertaking?

According to the Gates Foundation:

“In 2020, the entire World Health Organization (WHO) African Region was certified free of wild poliovirus, four years after Nigeria—the last polio-endemic country in Africa—recorded its final case of wild polio. Today, wild polio is found only in Afghanistan and Pakistan.”

The 21st Century Wire report refutes the above statement of the Gates Foundation:

“The United Nations was warned that a major international vaccine initiative is actually causing a deadly outbreak of the very disease it was supposed to wipe-out.

While international organisations like the World Health Organization (WHO) will regularly boast about ‘eradicating polio’ with vaccines—the opposite seems to be the case, with vaccines causing the deaths of scores of young people living in Africa.

Health officials have now admitted that their plan to stop ‘wild’ polio is backfiring, as scores of children are being paralyzed by a deadly strain of the pathogen derived from a live vaccine – causing a virulent wave of polio to spread.

This latest pharma-induced pandemic started out in the African countries of Chad and Sudan, with the culprit identified as vaccine-derived polio virus type 2.

…international health bodies have ‘accidentally’ reintroduced the disease in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and also Iran, as the central Asia region was hit by a virulent strain of polio spawned by the a pharmaceutical vaccine. Also, in 2019, the government of Ethiopia ordered the destruction of 57,000 vials of type 2 oral polio vaccine (mOPV2) following a similar outbreak of vaccine-induced polio.

The same incident has happened in India as well.

The oral polio vaccine is being pushed by the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI), a consortium which is supported and funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. ” (21st Century Wire, September 2020, emphasis added)

The Gates Foundation’s commitment is to “eradicate polio worldwide.”

In 2022, the Gates Foundation embarked on a 1.2 billion dollars polio vaccination program, which in many regards has spelled disaster.

Can the People of Palestine Trust Bill Gates?

A 500,000 Petition in May 2020 Called for an Investigation

By Muslim Mirror Web Desk

“An online petition is calling on the White House to investigate Bill Gates and Melinda Gates for “crimes against humanity” and “medical malpractice”. The petition received more than 500,000 signatures as of 11th May 2020.

The petition accuses the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation of “medical malpractice” for citing an accusation of “intentionally sterilizing Kenyan children through the use of a hidden HCG antigen in tetanus vaccines.” The petition also quoted Bill Gates’ when talking about his interest in “reducing population growth” by means of vaccinations.

Gates, UNICEF & WHO have already been credibly accused of intentionally sterilizing Kenyan children through the use of a hidden HCG antigen in tetanus vaccines.

In Y 2014, the Catholic Bishops Conference of Kenya conducted a study on the 5-injection, 2 yr vaccination project performed on female Kenyans aged 14-49, in a South African laboratory and concluded that “all 6 samples tested positive for the HCG antigen.”

“This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus, but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine,”

Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, said.

“This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization, but was ignored.”

The vaccine, which was administered to 2.3-M girls and women by the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF for free, was said to be funded by Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), an organization started and funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. “(Muslim Mirror, emphasis added)

***

We are in solidarity with the people of Palestine.

Do not trust Bill Gates and Dr. Tedros. They are fully supportive of the Netanyahu government’s criminal undertakings.

An independent laboratory examination of the polio vaccine which is intended for Gaza must be conducted.

Refuse the polio vaccine.

Follow Dr. Gerard Delepine:

“Why vaccinate children against a disease that can be completely eradicated by drinking water?

Demand the importation of clean water and food.

[This video by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky and Drago Bosnic was first published by Global Research. You can watch it here.]

Let us restore peace and internationalism. Say no to an “oppressive digital world order”!

Internationalism: The United Nations is being privatised. The criminalization of the U.N. judicial system.

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) are tacitly supportive of genocide.

Genocide is worldwide. What we are witnessing is the killing of children and the targeting of civilians.

“Guns and Butter.” No more butter: lots of guns.

Disarmament is required: massive increase in military spending. A $1.3 trillion U.S. nuclear weapons program.

Collapse of the welfare state. Economic warfare. The destabilization of industry. Bankruptcies, poverty, unemployment. Famines worldwide.

Media disinformation and war propaganda: “When the lie becomes the truth, there is no moving backwards”.

***

Video: Disarmament, Peace, Justice, Internationalism

Original in English. Click below: subtitles in 16 languages with hyperlinks:

English, Français, عربي, Русский, Español, 中文, Deutsch, Farsi, Português, Italiano, 日本語, 한국어, Türkçe, Српски, Bahasa Malay, ภาษาไทย

Our thanks to Lux Media for their support in the production of the video with subtitles in 16 languages.

To contribute to the GRTV-Lux Media video project, please consider subscribing to my Substack. Click here to see subscription options.

Click here to watch the video with subtitles in 16 languages.

[This video by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky and Peter Koenig was first published by Global Research. You can watch it here.]

“In God we trust.”

Money is made out of nothing.

The weaponization of money.

Financial warfare.

Lots of dollars in the pockets of “La classe politique.”

“In Trump we trust”?

***

Renowned economist Peter Koenig together with Michel Chossudovsky examines the complex history and geopolitics of the U.S. dollar.

While the dollar still prevails, its hegemonic role in international trade and finance is threatened.

***

Video: Fragile Hegemony of the U.S. Dollar

Original in English. Click below: subtitles in 16 languages with hyperlinks:

English, Français, عربي, Русский, Español, 中文, Deutsch, Farsi, Português, Italiano, 日本語, 한국어, Türkçe, Српски, Bahasa Malay, ภาษาไทย

Our thanks to Lux Media for their support in the production of the video with subtitles in 16 languages.

To contribute to the GRTV-Lux Media video project, please consider subscribing to my Substack. Click here to see subscription options.

Click here to watch the video with subtitles in 16 languages.

[This video by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky and Drago Bosnic was first published by Global Research. You can watch it here.]

America is no longer “an ally” of the European Union. Quite the opposite.

The insidious role of the U.S. government in carrying out acts of sabotage against the EU is amply documented. Beyond doubt.

Meanwhile corrupt EU politicians are not only blaming Russia, they are setting the stage for the destabilization and impoverishment of several European countries on behalf of Washington.

They are “sleeping with the enemy” to the detriment of the people of Europe.

In this GRTV video production, Michel Chossudovsky and Drago Bosnic focus on the history of the European colonial powers as well as the complex contemporary relationship between Europe and America.

See also:

America is at War against Europe. High Treason against the People of Europe

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, May 14, 2026

***

Video: America’s War against Europe

Original in English. Click below: subtitles in 16 languages with hyperlinks:

English, Français, عربي, Русский, Español, 中文, Deutsch, Farsi, Português, Italiano, 日本語, 한국어, Türkçe, Српски, Bahasa Malay, ภาษาไทย

Our thanks to Lux Media for their support in the production of the video with subtitles in 16 languages.

To contribute to the GRTV-Lux Media video project, please consider subscribing to my Substack. Click here to see subscription options.

Click here to watch the video with subtitles in 16 languages.

[This video was produced by Big Picture. It was published by Global Research. You can watch it here.]

In this in‑depth conversation, economist and Global Research founder Prof. Michel Chossudovsky lays out how NATO’s proxy war in Ukraine, the genocide in Palestine, economic warfare, and a multi‑trillion‑dollar nuclear rearmament drive all connect into a single, emerging global war.

He argues that we are already inside a world‑scale conflict—military, financial, and informational—that is widely misunderstood, dangerously normalized, and far closer to a nuclear tripwire than most people realize.

This interview is part of the WWIII series of long‑form discussions with thinkers, strategists, and dissidents from around the world, building toward the feature documentary WWIII, which asks whether humanity can pull back from the brink before a Third World War.

How Empire Manufactures Global War

Interview with Michel Chossudovsky

The headlines make today’s crises feel disconnected—Ukraine, Gaza, NATO, China, energy prices, migration—but Michel Chossudovsky argues they are all fronts in a single, emerging world war.

In our latest WWIII interview, the economist and founder of Global Research explains how U.S. and NATO war planning, proxy conflicts, sanctions, and debt regimes have created a permanent state of global conflict that is economic as much as it is military. He traces the road from the U.S.-sponsored coup in Ukraine, to Nazi elements inside the Kiev government, to a NATO strategy that risks turning a regional war into a nuclear confrontation that could end human civilization.

Chossudovsky also digs into the “globalization of poverty”: how IMF and World Bank programs, energy‑price shock therapy, and resource grabs across the Global South function as economic warfare that drives mass migration and social collapse. For him, Gaza’s offshore gas fields, Eastern Europe’s pipelines, and Africa’s mineral wealth are not side stories—they are core battlefields in a system that treats entire nations as expendable in pursuit of control. Throughout the interview, he keeps returning to one basic point: you cannot understand the cost of war just in terms of battlefields; it is written into inflation, crumbling infrastructure, and the quiet erosion of life chances for millions at home and abroad.

This conversation is part of an ongoing WWIII interview series that brings together voices from across the political spectrum to map the architecture of a potential Third World War—and to ask whether it can still be prevented. As we release each episode, we are building toward the feature documentary WWIII, which will weave these perspectives into a single narrative about how we got here and what it would actually mean to stumble into nuclear war in the 21st century. If you want to follow the emergence of this global conflict with more clarity than the nightly news allows, subscribe, share this series with people who need to see it, and stay tuned as we move step by step toward the film’s release.

***

World War III Trailer: The Documentary & Interview Series

by James Patrick

The Documentary chronicles the current flashpoints of conflict in Ukraine and the Middle East.

Through exclusive interviews with military, financial, and geopolitical experts, the film places today’s events within the recurring cycles of empire—the rise and fall that has marked civilizations throughout history. It challenges viewers to see the unfolding saga of WWIII as yet another chapter in humanity’s enduring drama of power and folly.

[Click here to watch the video.]

The mission of this production is to document the origins of the outbreak and forcast the potential outcomes of the Third World War, enabling viewers to assess the evolving situation and prepare for what may come.

If you value this project, please share this interview and consider donating to the production of WWIII: The Documentary & Interview Series.

As with our previous film, Planet Lockdown, we are releasing all interviews in full, providing the public with a collection of high level cinema interviews to better understand the events shaping our times. All interviews are freely available here.

If you believe in self-ownership and achieved success in your life and wish to preserve what you’ve accomplished through this war period, contact my friend and producer of this film, Swiss precious metals advisor, Claudio Grass. Email him here.

[This article by Peter Koenig was first published by Global Research. You can read it here.]

In a recent Buddhist retreat in Lima, Peru, about 200 participants were urged to abstain for the three-day retreat from our enslavement screens, “smart” phones, computers and television.

Difficult to say how many really followed the advice, but many did.

What was amazing is that during the first day, ignoring constant phone notifications was not easy for the many. But consciously resisting it made it easier. And the following days, we were hardly thinking of them anymore. The days were filled with meditation and different types of spiritual exercises… the digital age was peacefully removed into a corner.

Unfortunately, after the retreat, the hide-out corner became lively again and took up again most of our attention, in “angst” of what we may have missed during the highly divine retreat. Spirituality must have gradually evaporated again… and what we call “reality” kicked in.

Interestingly, what we call “reality” is a fake, indoctrinated reality. Over years we were told that technical advances, or as the World Economic Forum (WEF’s) Great Reset calls it, The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) is a concept describing how emerging technologies are blurring the lines between the physical, digital, and biological worlds. It fundamentally alters how we live, work, and relate to one another.

Sending messages, videos, and silly jokes, rather than talking to each other, interchanging with physically presence. Along with this brainwashing propaganda, we were drugged with the belief that working from home is full of advantages. It is an outright lie.

These “work-from-home” benefits are geared to separate us from one another so that physical interaction is avoided, making us more manipulable, controllable and dispensable, capable of being replaced by robots, and eventually by Artificial Intelligence (AI).

And mind you, the 4IR was illegally approved by the United Nations (UN). There was a not-well-known Cooperation Agreement signed between the WEF and the UN in Geneva in June 2019 that established an unequivocal link between the UN (created by 51 nations (today 193 member nations) in October 1945 in San Francisco) and the world’s by far richest NGO, the WEF, established in Geneva Switzerland.

The UN was created to guarantee peace in the world, to make sure that no more wars, especially World Wars (WW), that would ravage planet earth. That principle is anchored in the UN Charter. The WEF is owned and run by BlackRock, the world’s largest financial asset manager, controlling together with Vanguard, an interchangeable partner, and StateStreet, a close associate, some 25 to 30 trillion US dollars equivalent in assets, controlling literally every sector of vital industries and services, like energy, food, transport, health but also of the world’s weapon industrial complex. It is a blatant contradiction to the UN Charter. The UN is controlled by financial behemoths, with powers way beyond BlackRock.

The 4IR is, therefore, not a human-friendly program. It is a global control mechanism, that could be right out of Orwell’s “1984” – but way more complex, dangerous and deadly.

Unlike previous revolutions, 4IR is not just about smart machines and systems; it is characterized by a lightning-fast convergence of diverse technologies. The WEF highlights several core pillars:

• Digital: Artificial Intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), cloud computing, and blockchain.

• Physical: Autonomous vehicles, 3D printing (additive manufacturing), and advanced materials.

• Biological: Gene editing (CRISPR), synthetic biology, and neurotechnology.

CRISPR stands for “clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats.” It is a technology that research scientists use to selectively modify the DNA of living organisms including humans.

The WEF, an executing agency for the financial giants attempting to control the globe, and especially for those pulling the strings behind the WEF, are viewing these advancements as an unprecedented opportunity to address global challenges—such as fast-tracking the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) – in fact the population reduction agenda – and improving sustainable energy management – the fake Global Climate Change Agenda (GCCA).

The GCCA can be made responsible for every calamity affecting the world, the human race, including any new diseases and plandemics that another key executing agency, the World Health Organization (WHO) has been put in charge of.

As this article may go to print, the 79^th World Health Assembly (WHA) takes place in Geneva from 18 to 23 May 2026. One of its primary objectives is to make the Pandemic Treaty operational. For that, unanimous agreement is needed on the details of the Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS) System. This framework regulates how countries share virus samples and genetic data in exchange for guaranteed, equitable access to vaccines, diagnostics, and treatments.

PABS Agreement has not been reached during last year’s WHA. The PABS is unlikely to be approved this year either. The PABS would give WHO full control over every member country’s health system. National health sovereignty would be gone.

What is little known to most people, instead or in parallel with PABS debates, some 300 so-called “side events” are taking place in the WHA week. Topics range from Climate Change, Environment and One Health, to Global Public Health, to Health Systems and Universal Health Coverage, toPopulation and Care [Control]. See this for the full list.

Through its global Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution (C4IR), the WEF brings together governments, businesses, and civil society to establish governance protocols. This ensures that these exponential technologies are harnessed responsibly for human control.

While the C4IR’s foundational headquarters and its first location was launched in San Francisco, USA in 2017, it has evolved into a highly decentralized global network. The network spans dozens of independent national and thematic centers across Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and the Americas.

Digitization of humanity is thought-out to the last detail and the WHO is in-charge for much of these details. WHO has been created in April 1948, some three years after the UN and most of its sub-agencies. WHO is in charge of controlling health and death, a Rockefeller project; the Rockefeller clan being among the world’s prime eugenists.

Back to the Buddhist retreat: what people experienced by abstaining for three days from their electronic devices is rather phenomenal. Many said, they could imagine a life without these digital handcuffs. Indeed, it’s only a bit more than a generation that humanity has been gradually indoctrinated and subjugated to ever growing digitization, to its gradual use for everything.

We have literally developed a Stockholm syndrome – loving our hangman, our judge and prison ward. Sad but the majority of people today still have a hard time realizing it.

Imagine, only 30 years ago, the internet was hardly known to the public. The Network Infrastructure was developed by the US Department of Defense (DoD) (1969–1983), a Pentagon project, evolving into the modern internet on January 1, 1983.

The World Wide Web (1989) emerged from the CERN (Centre européen pour la recherche nucléaire, French acronym for European Center for Nuclear Research) in Switzerland. The Web is used to navigate the Internet.

What many say and feel is that, if EVERYONE would step back and return to the good old non-digital age, say 30 years back, it would be easy, because we would start afresh, and feel free again – in unison, having learned a lesson, never to forget.

That doesn’t mean we couldn’t use the societal useful electronic inventions for improving our lives – but never again fall for the targeted enslavement from full-control digitization – which is so far advanced that we are shortly before all electronic, digital money — to the point where you walk through a shopping mall’s cashier gate and pay by facial recognition which is linked to your all digital bank account. This exists already in large cities, like Moscow and other parts of the world.

Beware of misbehaving, or else your digital bank account is blocked.

Spiritual teachings and guidance may bond us together to form a strong body of think-alike humans called RESISTANCE.

And we shall overcome.

***

Peter Koenig is a geopolitical analyst, regular author for Global Research, and a former Economist at the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO), where he worked for over 30 years around the world. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed; co-author of Cynthia McKinney’s book “When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis” (Clarity Press – November 1, 2020).

Peter is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). He is also a non-resident Senior Fellow of the Chongyang Institute of Renmin University, Beijing.

[This article by Dr. Gary G. Kohls and Prof Michel Chossudovsky was first published by Global Research. You can read it here.]

Introduction

This article by Gary Kohls was first published on March 15, 2008 to commemorate the 40th anniversary of My Lai.

This week at the height of the Israel-U.S. genocide, we are commemorating the 58th Anniversary of the My Lai Massacre, March 15, 1968.

Since World War II, the targeting of innocent civilians has become the mainstay of U.S. atrocities. Remember General Curtis Lemay:

“After destroying North Korea’s 78 cities and thousands of her villages, and killing countless numbers of her civilians, [General] LeMay remarked,

“Over a period of three years or so we killed off – what – twenty percent of the population.”

It is now believed that the population north of the imposed 38th Parallel lost nearly a third its population of 8 – 9 million people during the 37-month long “hot” war, 1950 – 1953, perhaps an unprecedented percentage of mortality suffered by one nation due to the belligerance of another.” (Brian Willson)

Without exception, all US-NATO wars have targeted civilians in derogation of international law. It’s what you call “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P).

America’s “Humanitarian Wars”

Criminality is embedded in America’s foreign policy.

The conduct of massacres of civilians is invariably rewarded. Colin Powell, who was responsible for the coverup of the My Lai massacre, acceded to a “brilliant” career in the Armed Forces.

In 2001, he was appointed Secretary of State in the Bush administration. Although never indicted, Powell was also deeply implicated in the Iran-Contra affair.

It is worth noting that Colin Powell was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the time of the Gulf War, which resulted in the deaths of thousands of retreating Iraqi soldiers in what British war correspondent and Global Research Associate Felicity Arbuthnot entitled “Operation Desert Slaughter.”

“The forty two day carpet bombing, enjoined by thirty two other countries, against a country of just twenty five million souls, with a youthful, conscript army, with broadly half the population under sixteen, and no air force, was just the beginning of a United Nations led, global siege of near mediaeval ferocity.”

In the words of General Norman Schwartzkopf who led Operation Desert Slaughter,

“‘There was no one left to kill’…

There have been many US-sponsored My Lai’s since the Vietnam war. Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Libya, Palestine. Not to mention the “Dirty War” and military coups in Latin America.

In a bitter irony, in 2018, Vietnam became an “unofficial” military ally of the US against China.

—Michel Chossudovsky

The My Lai Massacre. Coverup of Extensive War Crimes

by Dr. Gary G. Kohls, March 15, 2008

Fifty-six years ago this week, on March 16, 1968, a company of US Army combat soldiers from the America Division swept into the South Vietnamese hamlet of My Lai, rounded up the 500+ unarmed, non-combatant residents, all women, children, babies and a few old men, and executed them in cold blood, Nazi-style. No weapons were found in the village, and the whole operation took only four hours.

Although there was a serious attempt to cover-up this operation (which involved a young up-and-coming US Army Major named Colin Powell), those who orchestrated or participated in this “business-as-usual” war zone atrocity did not deny the details of the slaughter when the case came to trial several years later. But the story had filtered back to the Western news media, thanks to a couple of courageous eye-witnesses whose consciences were still intact. An Army court-marital trial eventually convened against a handful of the soldiers, including Lt. William Calley and Company C commanding officer, Ernest Medina.

According to many of the soldiers in Company C, Medina ordered the killing of “every living thing in My Lai,” including, obviously, innocent noncombatants – men, women, children and even farm animals. Lt. Calley was charged with the murder of 109 civilians. In his defense statement he stated that he had been taught to hate all Vietnamese, even children, who, he had been told, “were very good at planting mines.”

That a massacre had occurred was confirmed by many of Medina’s soldiers and recorded by photographers, but the Army still tried to cover it up. The cases were tried in military courts with juries of Army officers, who eventually either dropped the charges against all of the defendants (except Calley) or acquitted them. Medina and all the others who were among the killing soldiers that day went free, and only Calley was convicted of the murders of “at least 20 civilians.” He was sentenced to life imprisonment for his war crime, but, under pressure from patriotic pro-war Americans, President Nixon pardoned him within weeks of the verdict.

The trial stimulated a lot of interest because it occurred during the rising outcry of millions of Americans against the infamous undeclared war that was acknowledged by many observers as an “overwhelming atrocity.” Ethical Americans were sick of the killing. However, 79% of those that were polled strenuously objected to Calley’s conviction, some veteran’s groups even voicing the opinion that instead of condemnation, he and his comrades should have received medals of honor for killing “Commie Gooks.”

Just like the extermination camp atrocities of World War II, the realities of My Lai deserve to be revisited so that it will happen “never again.” The Vietnam War was an excruciating time for conscientious Americans because of the numerous moral issues surrounding the mass slaughter in a war that uselessly killed 58,000 American soldiers, caused the spiritual deaths of millions more, killed 3 million Vietnamese (mostly civilians) and psychologically traumatized countless others on both sides of the conflict.

Of course the Vietnam War was a thousand times worse for the innocent people of that doomed land than it was for the soldiers. The Vietnamese people were victims of an army of brutal young men from a foreign land who were taught that the “little yellow people” were pitiful sub-humans and deserved to be killed – with some GIs preferring to inflict torture first. “Kill-or-be-killed” is a reality that is standard operating procedure for military combat units of every nation of every era and of every ideology.

Vietnam veterans tell me that there were scores, maybe hundreds, of “My Lai-type massacres “ during that war. Not surprisingly, the Pentagon refuses to acknowledge that truth. Execution-style killings of “potential” Viet Cong sympathizers (i.e., anybody that wasn’t a US military supporter) were common. Many combat units “took no prisoners” (a euphemism for murdering captives, rather than having to follow the nuisance Geneva Conventions which requires humane treatment for prisoners of war). The only unusual thing about the My Lai Massacre was that it was eventually found out. The attempted Pentagon cover-up failed but justice was still not done.

Very few soldiers or their commanding officers have ever been punished for the many war crimes that occurred during that war because those in charge knew that killing (and torturing) of innocent civilians during war-time is simply the norm – excused as “collateral damage.” After all, as US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld later infamously proclaimed, “stuff happens.”

The torture was enjoyable for some – for awhile (witness Auschwitz yesterday and Abu Graib and Guantanamo Bay today). And wars are profitable for many – and still are (witness the Krupp family of Nazi-era infamy and Halliburton, the Blackwater mercenaries, et al. today).

The whole issue of the justification of war, with its inherent atrocities, never seems to be thoroughly examined in an atmosphere of openness and historical honesty. Full understanding of the realities of war and its spiritual, psychological and economic consequences for the victims is rarely attempted. If we who are non-soldiers ever truly experienced the horrors of combat, the effort to abolish war would suddenly be a top priority (perhaps even for the current crop of “Chicken Hawk” warmongers in the Bush Administration).

If we actually knew the gruesome realities of war (or even understood the immorality of spending trillions of dollars on war preparation while hundreds of millions of people are homeless and starving) we would refuse to cooperate with the things that make for war. But that wouldn’t be good for the war profiteers. So those “merchants of death” must hide the gruesome truths and try instead to make war seem patriotic and honorable, with flag-waving sloganeering like “Be All That You Can Be.” Or they might try to convince the soon-to-be-childless mothers of doomed, dead or dying soldiers that their child had died fighting for God, Country and Honor instead of domination of the Middle East’s oil reserves.

Let’s face it. The US military standing army system has been bankrupting America at $500+ billion year after year after year – even in times of so-called “peace.” The warmongering legacy of the Pentagon is still with us, particularly among those “patriots” including GOP presidential candidate John McCain, who wanted to “nuke the gooks” in Vietnam. A multitude of un-elected policy-makers of that ilk are still in charge of US foreign policy today, and they have been solidifying their power to continue America’s misbegotten, unaffordable and unsustainable militarism with the huge profits made off the deaths, screams, blood, guts and permanent disabilities of those hood-winked soldiers who were told that they were ”saving the world for democracy” when in fact they were making the world safe for exploitive capitalism and obscene profits for the few. And the politicians entrenched in both major political parties, who are all-too-often paid lapdogs for the war profiteers, don’t want the gravy train to be derailed.

Things haven’t changed much even from the World War II mentality that conveniently overlooked the monstrous evil that was perpetrated on tens of thousands of unarmed, innocent civilians at Nagasaki on August 9, 1945, a war crime so heinous that the psychological consequences, immune deficiency disorders and cancers from that nuclear holocaust are still being experienced in unimaginable suffering 6 decades later.

Things haven’t really changed when one witnesses the political mentality that allows the 500,000 deaths of innocent Iraqi civilians in the aftermath of the first Gulf War or the 1,000,000 civilian deaths in the current fiasco in Iraq.

So it appears that our military and political leaders haven’t learned anything since My Lai. The people sitting next to you at work are, like most unaware Americans, almost totally ignorant of the hellish realities of the war-zone, so they may continue to be blindly patriotic and indifferent to the plight of the “others” who suffer so much in war. They may think that some people are less than human, and, therefore, if necessary, can be justifiably killed “for Volk, Fuhrer und Vaterland.”

As long as most American citizens continue to glorify war and militarism and ignore or denigrate the peacemakers; as long as the American public endorses the current spirit of nationalism and ruthless global capitalism; and as long as the America’s political leadership remains prudently silent (and therefore consenting to the homicidal violence of war) we will not be able to effect a change away from the influence of conscienceless war-mongers and war profiteers. The prophets and peacemakers are never valued in militarized nations, especially in times of war; indeed, they are always marginalized, demeaned and even imprisoned as traitors. And one of the reasons is that there are no profits to be made in peacemaking, whereas there are trillions to be made in the biggest business going: the preparation for war, the execution of war and the highly profitable “re-building” efforts (“blow it up/build it up” economics), all the while ignoring the “inconvenient” but inevitable collateral damage to the creation and its creatures.

As long as we continue to be led by unapologetic and merciless war-makers and their wealthy business cronies and as long as the ethical infants in Washington, DC continue to be corrupted by the big money bribes, there is no chance America will ever obtain true peace.

And unless America stops the carnage, fully repents and offers compensation for the damage it has done, its turn as a recipient of retaliatory violence will surely come, and it will come from those foreign and domestic victims that our nation’s leaders have treated so shamefully over the past half-century.

[This video by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky and Drago Bosnic was first published by Global Research. You can watch it here.]

A wave of media disinformation is unfolding in regard to the “dangerous Hantavirus” on board a Dutch cruise ship. A worldwide Hantavirus pandemic in the making?

The Hantavirus is casually referred to as “a deadly rat virus.”

What is the unspoken agenda of the “dangerous Hantavirus” on board the Dutch Cruise Ship?

Another “plandemic,” followed by the launching of a Hantavirus “vaccine”? The U.S. military (US ARMY) has already developed several Hantavirus DNA “vaccines” (US Army / USAMRIID).

Remember the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship and COVID-19? “Copy and Paste”?

The Diamond Princess arrived in Yokohama on February 3, 2020. A quarantine was imposed on the cruisers. Many passengers fell sick due to the confinement on the boat.

The Diamond Princess had set the stage for announcing the COVID Pandemic on February 20, 2020.

“Outside China there are now 1,076 cases in 20 countries, with a total of seven deaths….

….Of all cases outside China, more than half are among passengers on the Diamond Princess cruise ship“

Official Statement of WHO Director General Dr. Tedros, Geneva, 20 February 2020

The WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (February 21, 2020) said that he was “concerned that the chance to contain the coronavirus outbreak was “closing”.”

“I believe the window of opportunity is still there, but that the window is narrowing.”

Is the WHO Director General Tedros intent upon triggering the next pandemic? He knows how to do it.

“A matter of when, not if.”

“Copy and paste” the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship, February 20, 2020?

And what is the role of Dr. Tedros’s mentor Bill Gates?

***

Video: Worldwide Fear Campaign: The Hantavirus Pandemic

Forward the video. Spread the word to all major regions of the world.

Original in English. Click below: subtitles in 16 languages with hyperlinks:

English, Français, عربي, Русский, Español, 中文, Deutsch, Farsi, Português, Italiano, 日本語, 한국어, Türkçe, Српски, Bahasa Malay, ภาษาไทย.Thai

Our thanks to Lux Media for their support in the production of the video with subtitles in 14 languages.

To contribute to the GRTV-Lux Media video project, please consider subscribing to my Substack. Click here to see subscription options.

Click here to watch the video with subtitles in 16 languages.

[This article was originally published on Global Research. An updated version: You can read it here.]

A wave of media disinformation is unfolding in regard to the “dangerous Hantavirus” on board a Dutch cruise ship.

Meanwhile, the Western media has gone into high gear without supporting evidence, intimating that the hantavirus has triggered a “global health scare.”

The Hantavirus is casually referred to as “a deadly rat virus.”

Is it a fear campaign predicated on media disinformation?

Is it intended to distract people from what is happening in the global war theater?

This article focusses on the following:

PART I: Fear Campaign? Dangerous Hantavirus On Board Dutch Cruise Ship.

1. Media Coverage of the “Dangerous” Hantavirus on Board the Dutch MV Hondius Cruise Ship.

2. Features of Hantavirus and Transmission to Humans

3. The WHO Report Entitled Hantavirus Cluster Linked to Cruise Ship Travel, Multi-country. May 4, 2026

4. Analysis of the Evidence

5. Towards the Development of a Hantavirus “Vaccine”

6. Future Pandemics

PART II: Remember The Diamond Princess Cruise Ship? Sets the Stage for Announcing the COVID Pandemic, February 20, 2020

“Outside China there are now 1,076 cases in 20 countries, with a total of seven deaths….

….Of all cases outside China, more than half are among passengers on the Diamond Princess cruise ship.“

—Official Statement of WHO Director General Dr. Tedros, Geneva, 20 February 2020

PART I

1. Media Coverage of the “Dangerous” Hantavirus on Board the Dutch MV Hondius Cruise Ship.

According to Britain’s The Sun:

“A CRUISE ship feared to be harbouring a deadly rat virus will dock in the Canary Islands after the tragic deaths of three passengers.

Officials are desperately looking to contain the lethal outbreak to the luxury vessel but are now being made to search for dozens of people who flew with an infected passenger just days before she died.

Three people on the Dutch MV Hondius have died of the rare, but severe, hantavirus which has sparked a global health scare.

A British man, 69, is fighting for his life in a South African hospital, and two seriously ill crew members – including another UK national – are still stranded aboard the vessel awaiting evacuation.

The Spanish Health Ministry has now confirmed that it will receive the virus-ravaged ship in the Canary Islands “in accordance with international law and humanitarian principles” (emphasis added)

According to the CBC,

”Health authorities have identified the Andes strain of hantavirus, which can be transmitted from person to person, in passengers who were on a cruise ship at the centre of a deadly outbreak of the rare infection, officials said Wednesday.

Two patients with hantavirus and one suspected of being infected were evacuated from the MV Hondius ship and flown to the Netherlands on Wednesday, the United Nations health agency said. The flight arrived in Amsterdam on Wednesday evening local time.

The Dutch Foreign Affairs Ministry said the three people evacuated were a 56-year-old Briton, a 41-year-old Dutch national and a 65-year-old German. The ministry said they would be “immediately transferred to specialized hospitals in Europe.” A Dutch hospital confirmed it would take one, and German authorities said they were preparing for a second.

Two “remain in a serious condition,” Oceanwide Expeditions said, and the third had no symptoms but was “closely associated” with a German passenger who died on May 2. (CBC)

Ongoing Fear Campaign: The Next Pandemic

2. Features of Hantavirus and Transmission to Humans

“Orthohantavirus is a genus of viruses that includes all hantaviruses that cause disease in humans. …

Hantaviruses, are naturally found primarily in rodents. In general, each hantavirus is carried by one rodent species and each rodent that carries a hantavirus carries one hantavirus species.”

In humans hantaviruses causes essentially two distinct syndromes.

1. hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS)

2. hantavirus pulmonary syndrome” (HPS).

2.1 Symptoms

The Symptoms associated wih “Hantavirus hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome” (HFRS)

Symptoms include:

“headache, lower back pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, bloody stools, bleeding in the respiratory tract, renal symptoms such as kidney swelling, … excess protein in urine, as well as blood cells in the urine.”

The Symptoms associated with Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome (HPS), are

“sudden onset of coughing, shortness of breath, and elevated heart rate ….attributable to fluid buildup in the lungs.”

Do these symptoms coincide with the WHO reported cases ( See our analysis of the evidence in Section 4.1.)

2.2 Question: Were rodent species detected inside the ship?

Question: Were rodent species detected inside the ship? Neither the media reports nor the WHO provide tangible evidence.

What the media states without evidence in relation to the ship:

“passengers … were on a cruise ship at the centre of a deadly outbreak of the rare infection”

At the time of writing, the World Health Organization (WHO) has no evidence of human-to-human transmission on the cruise ship, nor does it have evidence of the presence of rodents “in areas were passengers were exposed”.

Ironically, reports point to “two main theories regarding how passengers may have been exposed”:

“Rodents on board the ship left infected droppings or urine in areas where passengers were exposed.”

Shore Excursions: Passengers may have encountered infected rodents or their excretions during shore excursions in areas known to harbor hantavirus”.

Neither of these “two main theories” are corroborated. No evidence.

3. WHO Report: Hantavirus Cluster Linked to Cruise Ship Travel, Multi-country. May 4, 2026

“On 2 May 2026, a cluster of passengers with severe respiratory illness aboard a cruise ship was reported to the World Health Organization.

The ship is carrying 147 passengers and crew. As of 4 May 2026, seven cases (two laboratory confirmed cases of hantavirus and five suspected cases) have been identified, including three deaths, one critically ill patient and three individuals reporting mild symptoms. Illness onset occurred between 6 and 28 April 2026 and was characterized by fever, gastrointestinal symptoms, rapid progression to pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome and shock.

Further investigations are ongoing. The outbreak is being managed through coordinated international response, and includes in-depth investigations, case isolation and care, medical evacuation and laboratory investigations.

Human hantavirus infection is primarily acquired through contact with the urine, faeces, or saliva of infected rodents. It is a rare but severe disease that can be deadly. Although uncommon, limited human to human transmission has been reported in previous outbreaks of Andes virus (a specific species of hantavirus). WHO currently assesses the risk to the global population from this event as low and will continue to monitor the epidemiological situation and update the risk assessment.

Description of the situation

On 2 May 2026, WHO received notification from the National International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) Focal Point of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (hereafter referred to as the United Kingdom) regarding a cluster of severe acute respiratory illness, including two deaths and one critically ill passenger, aboard a Dutch-flagged cruise ship.

On 2 May 2026, laboratory testing conducted in South Africa confirmed hantavirus infection in one patient who is critically ill and in intensive care. On 3 May, one additional death was reported. A further three suspected cases remain on board. As of 4 May, a total of seven (two confirmed and five suspected) cases, including three deaths, have been reported.

The vessel departed Ushuaia, Argentina, on 1 April 2026 and followed an itinerary across the South Atlantic, with multiple stops in remote and ecologically diverse regions, including mainland Antarctica, South Georgia, Nightingale Island, Tristan da Cunha, Saint Helena, and Ascension Island. The extent of passenger contact with local wildlife during the voyage, or prior to boarding in Ushuaia remains undetermined. The vessel carries a total of 147 individuals, including 88 passengers and 59 crew members. Onboard passengers and crew represent 23 nationalities. As of 4 May 2026, the vessel is moored off the coast of Cabo Verde.

Summary of cases:

Case 1: An adult male developed symptoms of fever, headache, and mild diarrhoea on 6 April 2026 while on board the ship. By 11 April, the case developed respiratory distress and died on board on the same day. No microbiological tests were performed. The body of the passenger was removed from the vessel to Saint Helena (a British Overseas Territory) on 24 April.

Case 2: An adult female, who was a close contact of case 1, went ashore at Saint Helena on 24 April 2026 with gastrointestinal symptoms. She subsequently deteriorated during a flight to Johannesburg, South Africa, on 25 April. She later died upon arrival at the emergency department on 26 April. On 4 May, the case was subsequently confirmed by PCR with hantavirus infection. Contact tracing for passengers on the flight has been initiated.

Cases 1 and 2, had travelled in South America, including Argentina, before they boarded the cruise ship on 1 April 2026.

Case 3: An adult male presented to the ship’s doctor on 24 April 2026 with febrile illness, shortness of breath and signs of pneumonia. On 26 April, his condition worsened. He was medically evacuated from Ascension to South Africa on 27 April, where he iscurrently hospitalised in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Laboratory testing on an extensive respiratory pathogen panel was negative; however, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing confirmed hantavirus infection on 2 May 2026. Serology, sequencing and metagenomics are ongoing.

Case 4: An adult female, with presentation of pneumonia, died on 2 May 2026. The onset of symptoms was on 28 April, with fever and a general feeling of being unwell.

Three suspected cases have reported high fever and/or gastrointestinal symptoms and remain on board. Medical teams in Cabo Verde are evaluating the patients and collecting additional specimens for testing.” (emphasis added)

4. Analysis of the Evidence

4.1 Symptoms

The WHO Report on the Hantavirus (Section 3) points to “a total of seven (two confirmed and five suspected) cases, including three deaths”.

Cases 1 and 2 were reported with “fever and gastrointestinal symptoms”. The latter do not correspond to the health impacts of Hantavirus infection on humans, namely

“Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal syndrome” (HFRS)

“Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome” (HPS). (as outlined in Section 2.1 above).

Moreover, the WHO confirms that “three suspected cases” were reported with “high fever and/or gastrointestinal symptoms”. The latter are unrelated to the symptoms of Hantavirus infections on humans, namely HFRS and HPS described in Section 2 quoted above. What is reported are gastrointestinal symptoms coupled with fever. The high fever is not of a hemorrhagic nature as described in HFRS i.e. “conditions related to excessive bleeding.”

4.2 The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Test

The alleged “two confirmed cases” of hantavirus infection: are presented by the WHO as “confirmed” by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, namely RT-PCR positive. This statement is erroneous.

While the PCR test continues to be used, a WHO’s Advisory dated January 20, 2021 questions the validity of the RT-PCR test (positive), which means that the above statement pertaining to the two RT-PCR hantavirus cases are not confirmed.

The RT-PCR test does not identify/detect the virus. What the PCR test identifies are genetic fragments of numerous viruses (including influenza viruses types A and B and coronaviruses which trigger common colds).

The results of the RT-PCR test cannot “confirm” whether an individual who undertakes the PCR test is infected with Hantavirus. A positive test does not mean that you have the hantavirus and/or that you could transmit the hantavirus.

“The PCR is a process. It does not tell you that you are sick.”

Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Laureate and Inventor of the RT-PCR, passed away in August 2019.

According to Dr. Kary Mullis,

“The PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself.”

According to renowned Swiss immunologist Dr. B. Stadler:

“So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected, but a small shattered part of the viral genome.

The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left.

Even if the infectious viri are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected].”

Of significance: The WHO January 2021 Advisory was then followed a few months later by the bombshell decision of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (July 21, 2021) to withdraw the PCR test as a valid method for detecting and identifying SARS-CoV-2.

As of December, 31 2021, the PCR test is no longer considered valid by the CDC in the U.S.

Bombshell: CDC No Longer Recognizes the PCR Test As a Valid Method for Detecting “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases”?

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, December 29, 2021

***

What this implies is that both the CDC and the WHO have formally acknowledged the failures of the RT-PCR test, without however implementing a shift in the methodology of detecting and identifying the hantavirus.

5. Towards the Development of a Hantavirus “Vaccine”?

What is the unspoken agenda of the “dangerous Hantavirus” On Board the Dutch Cruise Ship? Is it to trigger another “plandemic”, followed by the launching of a hantavirus “vaccine”?

According to a timely article by Dr. Nicolas Hulscher, the development of the Hantavirus “Vaccine” is already ongoing, in part under the auspices of US Army USAMRIID.

The Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization (VIDO) is a University of Saskatchewan Research Centre, “specializing in vaccine development for humans and animals.”

“13 documented hantavirus vaccine and gene-therapy programs in active development” are contemplated:

• 6 DNA “vaccines” (US Army / USAMRIID) — many of them “needle-free” jet-injector versions

• 3 mRNA “vaccines” (Moderna + Korea University, Chinese research team, VIDO Canada)

• 2 viral vector “vaccines” (UK institutions + VIDO Canada)

• 1 inactivated vaccine (Hantavax — already licensed and used in South Korea)

• 1 protein subunit vaccine (VIDO Canada)

See table below:

[Click here for an enlarged view.]

See:

The Vaccine Cartel and US Army Are Developing 13 Hantavirus Vaccines and Gene-Therapies

By Nicolas Hulscher, May 07, 2026

***

According to Dr. N. Hulscher:

“The US Army hantavirus DNA “vaccines” are not vaccines. They are literally plasmid DNA gene-therapies. Each one contains lab-made circular DNA (plasmids) carrying the hantavirus M-segment genes that code for the virus’s surface glycoproteins (Gn and Gc).

When injected (often with a needle-free jet injector or electroporation device), your own cells absorb the DNA, read it like a blueprint, and start manufacturing the pathogenic hantavirus proteins themselves.

While several Hantavirus Vaccine projects are already contemplated, the 2025 WHO sponsored Pandemic Treaty adopted by the WHO member states is in a bind.

“Perhaps the hantavirus situation is being pushed hard because the WHO’s pandemic treaty negotiations hit a major roadblock just 5 days ago. (May 1st)

Member states still can’t agree on the Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS) annex, meaning the pandemic treaty can’t come into effect.

This clearly angered WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, prompting him to warn the next pandemic was “a matter of when, not if.”

6. Future Pandemics

What is the role of the Dutch MV Hondius Cruise Ship coupled with Dr. Tedros in the driving seat? Not to mention the role of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation which finances the WHO.

In the video below, Gates speaks about the likelihood of future pandemics and the need for better preparedness, noting that another global outbreak is expected within the next few decades.

“In the interview from a year ago (reposted on May 6, 2026) with The View, Bill Gates speaks on the COVID-19 pandemic before speaking on expected future pandemics:

“And it won’t be the last pandemic [says Gates]. The next one could be far more severe. I mean, this one, it killed millions.”(Briefly)

[Image: iAnonPatriot/X, Getty Images]

Click here to access the Bill Gates video.

Flashback to Dr. Tedros’s February 20th, 2020 Press Conference regarding The Diamond Princess Cruise Ship and the announcement of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

That was six years ago, the WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said that he was “concerned that the chance to contain the coronavirus outbreak was “closing.”

Is WHO Director General Tedros intent upon triggering the next pandemic? He knows how to do it.

“A Matter of When, Not If”

“Copy and paste” the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship, February 20, 2020?

And what is the role of WHO Director Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus’s mentor Bill Gates?

Click here to read Part II.

[This video by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky and Drago Bosnic was first published by Global Research. You can watch it here.]

Under the mandate of U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr, America’s Pharmaceutical Giant Pfizer Inc. was condemned to pay $2.3 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice, to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products.

“The company [Pfizer] will pay a criminal fine of $1.195 billion, the largest criminal fine ever imposed in the history of United States.”

Pfizer’s CEOs were not arrested. They were put on “probation” by the U.S. DOJ.

A probation officer under the auspices of the U.S. DOJ had the mandate to “investigate and supervise persons charged with or convicted of federal crimes.” In the case of Pfizer’s probation, the DOJ had called upon the company to “cease its conduct of criminal activities.”

“As part of the settlement, Pfizer also agreed to enter into an expansive corporate integrity agreement with the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS].”

Pfizer: “Once a criminal, you are a criminal for life”?

Did your government inform you that the Covid-19 vaccine is conducted by a criminal entity?

“The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) did not cancel Pfizer’s criminal record through a presidential pardon.”

Upon the launching of the mRNA vaccine in December 2020, both the media and governments Worldwide failed to inform the public that Pfizer had a criminal record with the US DOJ.

Had they informed the public, millions of lives would have been saved.

Supplemental reading:

Pfizer Has a Criminal Record. Did the Media or Your Government Inform You? Had You Known Would You Have Accepted to Receive the Covid-19 mRNA Vaccine?

By US Department of Justice and Prof Michel Chossudovsky, November 02, 2024

The mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine: They are Killing our Children Worldwide

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, April 18, 2026

Video: Pfizer Has a Criminal Record with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). Yes, It’s a “Killer Vaccine”

Our video production focusses on the criminality behind the Pfizer mRNA vaccine.

We propose:

• The immediate repeal and withdrawal of the vaccine worldwide in the 193 member states of the United Nations;

• The launching of class action criminal lawsuits worldwide against Pfizer.

Forward the video. Spread the word to all major regions of the world.

Original in English. Click below: subtitles in 14 languages with hyperlinks:

English, Français, عربي, Русский, Español, 中文, Deutsch, Farsi, Português, Italiano, 日本語, 한국어, Türkçe, Српски.

Our thanks to Lux Media for their support in the production of the video with subtitles in 14 languages.

To contribute to the GRTV-Lux Media video project, please consider subscribing to my Substack. Click here to see subscription options.

Click here to watch the video with subtitles in 14 languages.

Michel Chossudovsky reviews in detail how this insidious project “destroys people’s lives”. He provides a comprehensive analysis of everything you need to know about the “pandemic” — from the medical dimensions to the economic and social repercussions, political underpinnings, and mental and psychological impacts.

“My objective as an author is to inform people worldwide and refute the official narrative which has been used as a justification to destabilize the economic and social fabric of entire countries, followed by the imposition of the “deadly” COVID-19 “vaccine”. This crisis affects humanity in its entirety: almost 8 billion people. We stand in solidarity with our fellow human beings and our children worldwide. Truth is a powerful instrument.”

Reviews

This is an in-depth resource of great interest if it is the wider perspective you are motivated to understand a little better, the author is very knowledgeable about geopolitics and this comes out in the way Covid is contextualized. —Dr. Mike Yeadon

In this war against humanity in which we find ourselves, in this singular, irregular and massive assault against liberty and the goodness of people, Chossudovsky’s book is a rock upon which to sustain our fight. –Dr. Emanuel Garcia

In fifteen concise science-based chapters, Michel traces the false covid pandemic, explaining how a PCR test, producing up to 97% proven false positives, combined with a relentless 24/7 fear campaign, was able to create a worldwide panic-laden “plandemic”; that this plandemic would never have been possible without the infamous DNA-modifying Polymerase Chain Reaction test – which to this day is being pushed on a majority of innocent people who have no clue. His conclusions are evidenced by renown scientists. —Peter Koenig 

Professor Chossudovsky exposes the truth that “there is no causal relationship between the virus and economic variables.” In other words, it was not COVID-19 but, rather, the deliberate implementation of the illogical, scientifically baseless lockdowns that caused the shutdown of the global economy. –David Skripac

A reading of  Chossudovsky’s book provides a comprehensive lesson in how there is a global coup d’état under way called “The Great Reset” that if not resisted and defeated by freedom loving people everywhere will result in a dystopian future not yet imagined. Pass on this free gift from Professor Chossudovsky before it’s too late.  You will not find so much valuable information and analysis in one place. –Edward Curtin

ISBN: 978-0-9879389-3-0

Year: 2022,  PDF Ebook

Pages: 164, 15 Chapters

Price: $11.50 FREE COPY! Click here (docsend) and download.

You may also access the online version of the e-Book by clicking here.

We encourage you to support the eBook project by making a donation through Global Research’s DonorBox “Worldwide Corona Crisis” Campaign Page. 

Are There Armageddonists in the Corridors of the U.S. State Department?

By Felicity Arbuthnot

Here is a story told to me by Dr. Bernard Lown, one of the co-founders of International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW) during the Reagan era. In 1995, IPPNW collectively won the Nobel Peace Prize. Bernard Lown and Yevgeny Chazov committed to abolishing Nuclear War.

The U.S. State Department and the Book of Revelations

Since Lown travelled, lecturing, to the USSR frequently and had built trust over many years at all levels, the US State Department asked if he would engage in some unofficial diplomacy.

Relations between the two countries were far worse than most realised.

After one such visit to Moscow, I met Bernard Lown in Paris. We sat in dappled Spring sun, at a pavement breakfast café - fresh squeezed orange, coffee, croissants:

“I came back two days ago [from Moscow] and went to talk (at the State Department) of the concerns in Moscow.

Afterwards, a senior official - a household name (which he declined to divulge) walked me to the exit. As we neared the exit, he put his arm round my shoulders:

‘Don’t worry, Professor Lown, if there is a nuclear war, we will be the first ones to rise up and meet Jesus in the sky.’” Lown, used to the vagaries of the unwell, responded: “Tell me, does anyone else in this building feel as you do?”

“Oh yes, many of us do.”

Foreign policy lies prevail. The same neocons “are at it again.” “We must bomb Iran.” Preemptive nukes.

Reminder to the crusading Armageddonists ….. “Thou shalt not kill.” —Exodus 20:1

Trump’s Nomination of Pete Hegseth to lead the Pentagon

by Michel Chossudovsky

There are indications that Christian Zionism prevails in the corridors of the State Department and the Pentagon. This is not a recent phenomenon. (See Felicity Arbuthnot above)

Donald Trump’s defense secretary appointee Pete Hegseth is not only a “war hawk,” he is a “Third Temple cultist” who “wants war with Iran and Russia.”

Hegseth says he is a Christian who believes Jesus will “return” once the “Third Temple” is built where the Dome of the Rock, also called the Al-Aqsa mosque compound, now sits on the Temple Mount in the Old City of Jerusalem. (See Global Research)

“Pete Hegseth, Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Defense has also sparked controversy among the military.

The 44-year-old Fox News host and Army National Guard who will be heading the Pentagon has been described by Paul Rieckhoff (founder of Independent Veterans of America) as “the least qualified nominee for SecDef in American history.” (Uriel Araujo, Global Research)

In the words of Philip Giraldi:

Perhaps the most demented of [Trump’s appointees] is also the individual in the most potentially threatening position, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Hegseth is a journalist with FOX news with one observer noting that he has never managed any organization larger than his three wives and five children prior to his upgrade to the $1 trillion budgeted 2.9 million Pentagon employees. Even by Christian Zionist standards, he might well be considered to be an extremist.”

“An excerpt from Hegseth’s book, American Crusade, Our Fight to Stay Free (2020) states:

“Simply put: if you don’t understand why Israel matters and why it is so central to the story of Western civilization — with America being its greatest manifestation — then you don’t live in history.“America’s story is inextricably linked to Judeo-Christian history and the modern state of Israel.

“You can love America without loving Israel but that tells me your knowledge of the Bible and Western civilization is woefully incomplete. …

“If you love America, you should love Israel. We share history, we share faith, and we share freedom. We love free people, free expression, and free markets.”

Trump’s boss of the Pentagon is committed to the “Cult of the Three Temples.” There is no firm evidence that Trump’s Secretary of Defense is committed to using nukes within the context of Armageddon Theology as defined in the Book of Revelations.

Does this “Third Temple Narrative” have a bearing on Washington’s conduct of the war against Russia? There is a movement within Christian Zionism which favours the use of nuclear war.

Video: Meet Trump’s American Crusader: Pete Hegseth

Armageddon Theology and the Risk of Global War: The Limits of Religious Tolerance in the Nuclear Age

Abstract

“Millions of Americans, primarily premillennialist fundamentalist Christians, believe that God has foreordained a global nuclear war as the precursor to the Second Coming of Christ.

Apocalyptic religious beliefs would be of less consequence were it not for the fact that after being given computer warning of an apparent nuclear attack, U.S. personnel in the midst of the electronic loop have just a few minutes to decide whether or not to launch missiles in retaliation.

For the sake of global safety, American psychologists and psychiatrists, under the auspices of the PRP, should be engaged in screening out personnel who are convinced that a nuclear attack against Russia would accord with God’s will.”

Read the full report here.

Below is a link to a 2007 article by award-winning veteran war correspondent Felicity Arbuthnot. Is the use of nuclear weapons entrenched in the Cult of Three Temples?

The U.S. State Department’s “Road to Armageddon”?

By Felicity Arbuthnot, March 08, 2026

[This article was originally published on Global Research. You can read it here.]

Presentation to the Kuala Lumpur Conference, Perdana Global Peace Forum, December 2006

See full transcript below.

Video: The Battle for Oil, Deadly Macroeconomic Medicine, The Danger of Nuclear War, “The War on Terrorism”

Transcript

I herewith introduce to you the first speaker Mr Michel Chossudovsky.

Our first Speaker wears many hats. He is an economist from the University of Ottawa who has published several books relating to poverty, globalization and the role of international monetary institutions such as the World Bank and the IMF. He is an esteemed scholar, whose writings have been translated into more than 20 languages.

His other hats include that of an advisor to numerous governments and also consultant to International organizations such as the UNDP.

Ladies and gentlemen, here is Professor Michel Chossudovsky.

[Applause]

Dear friends, ladies and gentlemen it’s a great privilege for me to be here today as an economist in a country which is committed to national sovereignty in the economic sense of the word and at a very critical moment in the history of this country, namely in 1997 under the Helm of Prime Minister Dr Tun Mahathir, precise and specific financial mechanisms were put in place which allowed or at least prevented the slide of the Ringgit, thereby foreclosing the possibility of massive bankruptcies and impoverishment as occurred in Thailand, Indonesia and South Korea. [Applause]

And this is not a rhetorical question because war and macroeconomics are intimately related. These so-called free market reforms have been essentially an instrument of dramatic impoverishment of millions of people around the world and the fact that Malaysia was able under very difficult conditions to foreclose this catastrophe.

It will be a landmark certainly in the nation’s history for years to come.

Today, the world is at the crossroads of the most serious crisis in modern history.

The United States has launched together with its indefectible British ally a military adventure which threatens the future of humanity. it is also coupled as I mentioned by these deadly macroeconomic reforms.

The war has an economic rationale to it. It is certainly does not have the objective of weeding out terrorism.

It has underlying economic objectives, the most important of which as far as the Middle East war is concerned is securing control over oil reserves.

It is characterized by advanced weapons systems.

This morning Helen Caldicott focused on the issue of nuclear weapons, there’s the whole doctrine of preemptive nuclear war which is of course crucial but one thing which I think is very important to understand is how the concepts have been turned upside down as far as nuclear weapons are concerned.

The United States has developed a new generation of what we call tactical nuclear weapons the mini-nukes namely small nuclear weapons but in fact they’re not so small [in terms of yield and explosive capacity] they are between 1/3 and six times a Hiroshima bomb and what has happened is that these nuclear weapons now after a period of review are considered “safe for civilians” because the explosion is underground.

Bear in mind, it’s a bit like the advisory on a packet of cigarettes which says smoking is dangerous for your health.

Now what has happened which is very important is that the Pentagon has gone through and has enlisted scientists and research labs and they essentially say that these explosions are underground and they are safe for civilians.

And in 2003, a December decision of the Senate ultimately approved the use of tactical nuclear weapons in conventional War theaters.

This decision has not been reported extensively or even in in a minimal way in the international press but what this means today in addition to the debate that we had this morning on nuclear weapons that this new generation of nuclear weapons now has been reclassified as a conventional weapon which can be used in conventional War theaters that is precisely the nature of that Senate decision and it is also slated to be used in the next phase of this of this war coupled with the military agenda uh which is a war Without Borders we see the emergence within the Western European countries, particularly the United States Canada, Britain, Australia we see the emergence of a police state apparatus, we see the criminalization of what I would describe as the criminalization of Justice because ultimately those who decide on the judicial system are the war criminals and we have a whole pattern and structure of arbitrary arrests of individuals who are tagged or targeted as alleged terrorists.

Dear ladies and gentlemen, the war on terrorism which is the main justification for waging a war of conquest which is clearly acknowledged in Military and National Security documents that the war on terrorism is fabricated. It fabricates an enemy.

The enemy is presented: it is the image of the enemy Bin Laden in fact the whole issue becomes so absurd if you read some of the speeches and the national security documents.

Osama Bin Laden is presented as a nuclear power.

Okay. Al-Qaeda is presented as capable of setting off nuclear explosions so that it is an upcoming nuclear power [according to President Obama] and therefore this justifies the development of preemptive nuclear weapons for defensive purposes and so on and the use of these tactical nuclear weapons deployed in conventional war theaters.

[This article by Drago Bosnic was first published on Global Research. You can read it here.]

In recent days and weeks, many former and current Russian military officers have expressed their skepticism and even frustration with how the Russian government is handling the escalating attacks by the Kiev Regime and its NATO overlords.

It’s become an axiom that the political West is coordinating and even directing attacks on Russia.

This includes multiple assassination attempts on top-ranking Russian figures and officials, even President Vladimir Putin himself.

However, despite several strong immediate military responses to such actions, including the use of the latest “Oreshnik” missiles, this still left much to be desired, especially among military personnel, whether they’re regular soldiers in the trenches or top-ranking officers in the High Command.

Still, the political West keeps escalating tensions with more daring attacks on the Russian oil industry and civilian infrastructure. In previous years, there were only a few incidents involving drone strikes from EU/NATO territory. This was credited to the Kiev regime, which supposedly “managed to slip through Belarus and Russia”. And yet, it’s now clear this is not the case and that the Neo-Nazi junta is using Poland and the Baltic states to attack Russian oil depots in and around St. Petersburg. However, even this is just the tip of the iceberg, because NATO is directly supporting attacks on oil infrastructure almost everywhere in European Russia. The Russian military has the world’s most advanced air and missile defenses, as well as unrivaled electronic warfare (EW) capabilities.

However, Russia is the world’s largest country and it’s exceedingly difficult to cover its vast territory with a sufficient number of SAM (surface-to-air missile) and EW systems.

In addition, there’s the issue of fatigue among military personnel forced to constantly scan for threats.

After all, the Russian military doctrine doesn’t stipulate constant defense. On the contrary, the main purpose of Russian air, missile and EW defenses is to blunt the edge of a hostile attack force and allow offensive-oriented troops to neutralize the invader. The problem is that the latest attacker can use the Neo-Nazi junta to maintain plausible deniability while continuing its strikes. This has left the Russian military in a legal limbo – responding directly would formally be an “unprovoked attack”.

However, the Russian military’s frustration is perfectly understandable. The government’s reluctance not only makes it very difficult to maintain normal economic activity, but also invites further aggression, as the enemy mistakes Moscow’s strategic patience for “weakness”. During a speech at the Civic Chamber of the Russian Federation, former Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, General Yuri Baluyevsky, stated that “red lines have long since ceased to function” and that “it’s time for a real war”. He called for a decisive rejection of the “so-called ‘red lines’ which no one pays any attention to anymore”. General Baluyevsky argues that “the enemy sees that Russia is not responding to its actions and is becoming even more brazen”.

“The lack of an adequate response only provokes further escalation. The enemy doesn’t understand words; they must be made to fear us, otherwise enemy drones will soon be flying in our skies as if they were at home. They’re already reaching the Urals, and soon they’ll start striking Siberia as well. Ukrainian drones landed on the Kremlin dome, Russian strategists attacked, and we’ve had zero reaction, just red lines. And the West, seeing this reaction, is also emboldened, knowing that no one except the Foreign Ministry will demand a response,” he warned, adding: “When a Ukrainian drone landed on the dome of the building housing the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, I kept waiting. Waiting for an answer. But instead, there were red lines again. When, when will we start fighting for real?”

General Baluyevsky’s statements certainly reflect the mood of the vast majority of Russian troops on the frontline. Many officers and soldiers have repeatedly warned that Russia needs to stop fighting with one hand tied behind its back. However, the Russian government’s reluctance to escalate has sound strategic reasoning. Namely, the idea that Russia cannot obliterate NATO-occupied Ukraine is ridiculous. If it really wanted to, the Kremlin could’ve done it on the first day of the special military operation (SMO). However, Ukraine is Russian land. It has been for over 1,200 years. The political West sees Ukrainians merely as brainwashed ethnic Russians who are “the perfect cannon fodder”. This is essentially true, although Ukrainians themselves refuse to acknowledge it.

And yet, they fail to read the statements of Western officials between the lines. For instance, when the infamous Lindsey Graham said that “the Russians are dying” and that this is “the best money we ever spent”, he wasn’t referring solely to the Russian military. For NATO, it doesn’t matter whether it’s Russians or Ukrainians dying. It’s all the same for them. As long as the killing continues, the political West sees this as a victory, which is why the pathologically Russophobic United Kingdom sabotaged the peace deal that would’ve ended the SMO in weeks or months rather than years. On the other hand, the Kremlin realizes it has no choice but to eliminate the rabid Neo-Nazis that the CIA and other Western intelligence services created and (ab)used to hijack former Ukraine in 2014.

Namely, since the brainwashing started centuries ago, the core of the Ukrainian identity, which is in Western Ukraine, was simply spread over the entire country and embedded into the so-called “nation-building” process that the US-led political West has perfected over the decades of its aggression against the entire world. It’s virtually impossible for Russia to turn back the clock and erase all this brainwashing that has been very successful among entire generations of young Ukrainians. Thus, Moscow has no choice but to implement the physical denazification and demilitarization of the Kiev regime. Obviously, this can only be done by military means. However, the Kremlin cannot use its full might, because it would then destroy its own NATO-occupied land filled with Russian historical heritage.

In addition, as previously mentioned, there’s also the Ukrainian people who are ethnic Russians, albeit deeply confused (at best) or turned into pathological Russophobes (at worst). It will take generations to undo the damage caused by the political West. On the other hand, there are also very important strategic considerations. Namely, if Russia were to directly respond to NATO provocations, this would only reunite the world’s most aggressive racketeering cartel. It would also come at a time when the relations between the United States and the EU are at an unprecedented historical low, with the Trump administration openly threatening to leave NATO. Why would Russia “repair” the world’s most aggressive racketeering cartel by retaliating now when it can just wait?

***

Drago Bosnic is an independent geopolitical and military analyst. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).

[This article was originally published on Global Research. You can read it here.]

Introductory Note

President Putin was accused by the ICC of genocide-like deportation of Ukrainian children.

Compare that to the killing of children in Gaza and the genocide against the people of Palestine which is fully endorsed by the heads of State and heads of government of the European Union.

They are complicit in the conduct of genocide under Article 3e of the 1948 Geneva Genocide Convention. Deux Poids Deux Mesures.

Compare that now to the recently released Epstein Files which reveal a horrifying international criminal network.

“The files suggest that millions of them have been trafficked by a massive globalist pedophile network employed by Western elites.” (Drago Bosnic, February 3, 2026)

***

NATO now firmly acknowledges that the war started in 2014 which would have required that from the very outset in February 2014 the warring parties abide by the Four Basic Principles of The Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC) which consists in:

“….respect for and protection of the civilian population and civilian objects, the Parties to the conflict shall at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives and accordingly shall direct their operations only against military objectives.” [Additional Protocol 1, Article 48]

Civilian population (children) and civilian objects (schools, hospitals, residential areas) were the deliberate object of UAF and Azov Battalion attacks in blatant violation of the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC).

In accordance with the LOAC, Moscow took the decision starting in February 2014 to come to the rescue of Donbass civilians including children.

Visibly the president of the I.C.C. Piotr Hofmanski in accusing President Putin of “unlawful kidnapping of Ukrainian children” hasn’t the foggiest understanding of Article 48. of the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC).

Is this an issue of incompetence?

Or has Piotr Hofmanski been co-opted into endorsing or casually ignoring the extensive crimes against humanity committed by the Neo-Nazi Azov Battalion, which happens to be supported by US-NATO?

At the Peace Conference in Switzerland (15-16 June, 2024), Russia was accused of

“Genocide-like Deportation of Ukrainian Children.”

See this (first minute) with Trudeau who supports the Neo-Nazi regime:

“Russia kidnapped thousands of Ukrainian kids, it’s genocide, it’s pure colonialism.”

At the August 15, 2025 Trump-Putin Summit In Alaska, a campaign was launched to arrest President Putin for having allegedly kidnapped 20,000 children.

And then see where these children were sent.

Video: Inside a Russian YouthCamp Condemned by the ICC

***

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued arrest warrants for President Vladimir Putin and his Children’s Rights commissioner, Maria Lvova-Belova, over the alleged “unlawful kidnapping of Ukrainian children’. According to the I.C.C:

“there are reasonable grounds to believe that each suspect bears responsibility for the war crime of unlawful deportation of population and that of unlawful transfer of population from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation, in prejudice of Ukrainian children.” (emphasis added)

The I.C.C. accusation directed against Vladimir Putin of “kidnapping” or “deportation” of Ukrainian children borders on ridicule.

The president of the I.C.C. Piotr Hofmanski (see below) refers to the Geneva Convention, without addressing the rights of civilians in a war zone.

The Azov Battalion as well as Ukrainian forces have routinely bombed civilians in Donbass since 2014. The I.C.C. fails to acknowledge that killing children in a war zone is a crime against humanity.

[Image: Swastika, Azov Battalion’s SS Wolfsangel symbol, NATO Flag (Right to Left)]

These are the Nazi terrorists who are killing children in Donbass. Their legitimacy is tacitly upheld by the I.C.C. They are generously funded by the “International Community.”

[Image: The Nazi SS Wolfsangel symbol]

The war did not start in February 2022. Since 2014, Donbass residential neighbourhoods, schools, hospitals, ambulances, etc. have been routinely targeted. From the 2014 Euromaidan and the US sponsored Coup d’Etat to February 2022, up to 14,000 Donbass residents have been killed.

Bombing of schools: it’s terrorism instigated by Kiev against Ukrainian Children.

What is the truth? What is the lie?

Thousands of children were killed by the Neo-Nazi Azov Battalion (which is supported by US-NATO).

Fleeing the war zone to save your children is tagged by the I.C.C. as “deportation.”

The people of Donbass have been under constant shelling for nearly a decade now and they don’t even duck when hearing incoming shells and rockets.

Children born in the besieged region don’t know what peace is. For them, shells hitting their homes is a “normal”, regular occurrence.

They never got the chance to see anything else. (Drago Bosnic, June 1, 2022, emphasis added)

Starting in 2014, thousands of Donbass families including children were provided safe haven in Russia, as part of a humanitarian initiative under the auspices of Moscow’s Ministry of Emergency Situations.

Russian families have welcomed them and provided assistance.

Many of the children who were provided safe haven in Russia are orphans whose parents were killed by the Azov Battalion.

And this is categorized by the I.C.C. and the mainstream media as the “kidnapping of children” by the President of the Russian Federation.

What absolute nonsense. It’s not only “nonsense,” it’s the concurrent “criminalization of mainstream media” and of the ICC.

“Genocide-like Deportation of Ukrainian Children” According to PM Trudeau (June 16, 2024)

“Russia kidnapped thousands of Ukrainian kids, it’s genocide, it’s pure colonialism.”

See this (first minute) with Trudeau who supports the Neo-Nazi regime.

And then see where these children were sent.

Russian Youth Camp Categorized as War Crimes against Children

Click here to read the full article.