Colin Powell and the “The Sloppy Dossier”: Plagiarism and “Fake Intelligence” Used to Justify the 2003 War on Iraq: Copied and Pasted from the Internet into an “Official” British Intel Report
The Iraq War's "Smoking Gun": Plagiarized quotations slipped into an official intelligence report pertaining to Iraq's WMD
This article by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky followed by the important text of Prof. Glen Rangwala was first published by Global Research in 2005
Our thoughts today are with the people of Iraq, whose country was invaded 21 years ago on March 20, 2003, based on a fraudulent and criminal agenda which was known prior to the March 20, 2003 invasion.
With the exception of U.K’s Channel IV, the media decided not to reveal the scam.
What was revealed in 2003 regarding the invasion of Iraq is of utmost relevance to the ongoing war in the Middle East and the threats directed against Iran.
The National Security strategy as outlined by US Central Command Headquarters (USCENTCOM) in 1995 was “First Iraq, Then Iran.”
This article first published in June 2005 focusses on the fake intelligence used to justify the invasion.
Colin Powell’s “intelligence report” presented to the UN Security Council on February 5, 2003 was fabricated.
The intimate details pertaining to Colin Powell’s fake report were revealed by Cambridge’s Dr. Glen Rangwala.
recent image
It was copied and pasted from the internet by members of PM Tony Blair’s staff.
The Iraq war was based on a Big Lie, which was known and documented MORE THAN A MONTH before the invasion of Iraq on March 20, 2003.
Both the US and UK media were instructed to remained mum.
The US Congress and the House of Commons failed to act. Glen Rangwala’s report was not made public.
PM Tony Blair Casually dismissed the Issue:
British Intelligence (MI-6) was not involved. In the words of Jane Review editor
The dossier "was clearly prepared by someone in Downing Street and it's obviously part of the prime minister's propaganda campaign," said Heyman. "The intelligence services were not involved -- I've had two people phoning me today to say, 'Look, we had nothing to with it.'"
… Sources in the Defense Ministry earlier this week leaked to the BBC a classified assessment by a British intelligence agency that there were no current links between Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's government and al Qaeda. The report appeared to contradict Blair's claims that Baghdad was giving shelter to al Qaeda operatives.”
(WP, February 7, 2003, emphasis added)
While Rangwala’s detailed findings were not made public, they were acknowledged and published by the House of Commons three months AFTER the onset of the war.
The evidence as well as the statement of Glen Rangwala confirmed the criminal and fraudulent nature of the 2003 War on Iraq.
Michel Chossudovsky, Substack, October 28, 2024
Colin Powell and the “The Sloppy Dossier”: Plagiarism and “Fake Intelligence” Used to Justify the 2003 War on Iraq: Copied and Pasted from the Internet into an “Official” British Intel Report
by Michel Chossudovsky, June 2005
Colin Powell’s “intelligence report” presented to the UN Security Council in early February 2003 was FABRICATED. It was copied and pasted from the internet by members of Tony Blair’s staff.
While the Chilcot Inquiry report was released in 2016, it is worth noting that most of the dodgy dossier evidence pertaining to Tony Blair and George W, Bush was available before the onset of the Iraq war in March 2003.
“Fake intelligence” was presented to the UN Security Council by Secretary of State Colin Powell on February 5, 2003.
Damning evidence refuting Colin Powell’s official intelligence report was revealed by Dr. Glen Rangwala, Newham College, Cambridge on Britain’s Channel 4 TV on February 6, 2003, on the day following Secretary of State Colin Powell’s historic Iraq WMD presentation to the UN Security Council:
“I would call my colleagues’ attention to the fine paper that the United Kingdom distributed . . . which describes in exquisite detail Iraqi deception activities.” (Colin Powell, UN Security Council, February 5, 2003)
Powell was referring to “Iraq Its Infrastructure Of Concealment, Deception And Intimidation”, published on January 30, 2003.
According to Rangwala, the British intelligence document was fake. It had not been prepared by British intelligence. It was copied and pasted from the internet by members of Tony Blair’s staff:
The Downing Street authors state they drew “upon a number of sources, including intelligence material” (p.1, first sentence). In fact, they copied material from at least three different authors and gave no credit to them. Indeed, they plagiarized, directly cutting and pasting or near quoting.
A close textual analysis suggests that the UK authors had little access to first-hand intelligence sources and instead based their work on academic papers, which they selectively distorted. Some of the papers used were considerably out of date. This leads the reader to wonder about the reliability and veracity of the Downing Street document. (Dr. Rangwala, emphasis added)
It was a fake document prepared on the instructions of prime minister Tony Blair with a view to building a “credible” justification to wage war on Iraq.
Rangwala’s analysis was more than a smoking gun. It revealed the Big Lie. It invalidated Colin’s Powell’s presentation to the UN Security Council. It had to be suppressed.
In many regards, the Rangwala revelation was far more important than the leak of the Secret July 2002 Downing Street Memo:
“C reported on his recent talks in Washington. There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy. The NSC had no patience with the UN route, and no enthusiasm for publishing material on the Iraqi regime’s record. There was little discussion in Washington of the aftermath after military action.”
The “WMD facts” had to be “documented”. Did British intelligence refuse to comply with Tony Blair’s demands to produce a fast track report which would “fix the facts”? Rangwala’s analysis confirms that British intelligence was not involved in what we might describe as the “Sloppy Dossier”.
The “facts” were put together in a hurry (not by MI6) but by Tony Blair’s public relations’ staff, who casually committed acts of plagiarism and political fraud in support of a criminal military agenda.
The report was finalized one week before Colin Powell’s presentation to the UN Security Council.
Revealed by Rangwala, the “facts” and supporting quotations were copied and pasted by members of Tony Blair’s cabinet from the internet and inserted into an official and “authoritative” intelligence document.
Plagiarism had become a means to justifying the war on Iraq.
The Rangwala revelation was the “unspoken truth”. With the exception of Channel 4 and The Guardian, it was not the object of mainstream media coverage both before as well as after the March invasion of Iraq.
It had to be suppressed. The invasion of Iraq had already been scheduled for March 2003.
“First Iran, Then Iran” According to USSTRATCOM
Video: Michel Chossudovsky
GlobalResearchTV, August 3, 2018
The Role of Colin Powell in Planning the War on Iraq
In retrospect, the Rangwala findings also bring to the forefront the insidious and complicit role of Colin Powell, who organized the Crawford Texas meetings in early April 2002 between Bush and Blair, as confirmed by the recently leaked emails (see below).
What these emails suggest is that Colin Powell had been entrusted in setting the stage for the war on Iraq, initially at the Bush-Blair Crawford meetings on April 5-7, 2002, leading up to his presentation of the British intelligence dossier on Iraq’s alleged WMD at the UN Security Council on February 5, 2003.
Lest we forget Colin Powell played a behind the scenes role in the Iran Contra Affair.
The Crawford meetings were intended to plan the war on Iraq.
Colin Powell was a central political instrument. The issue is who was Behind Colin Powell?
Who was present at the Crawford meetings? Reports confirm that Colin Powell, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Condoleeza Rice were among those present.
In the wake of the Iraq invasion, the plagiarized “British intelligence Iraq Dossier” which had been presented to the UN Security Council by (former) Secretary of State Colin Powell was so to speak “forgotten”.
The plagiarism issue nonetheless confirms beyond doubt the war crimes’ allegations against George W. Bush and Tony Blair.
Glen Rangwala’s report was known to Britain’s parliament.
There was no follow-up. Glen Rangwala‘s report confirmed the criminal nature of the US led war on Iraq, which resulted in more than 2 million civilian deaths.
It was brought to the attention of Global Research by Glen Rangwala.
In June 2003, Dr. Rangwala Memorandum was published by the House of Commons Select Committee on Foreign Affairs. Click to access the House of Commons text link below
Plagiarism and Iraq’s WMDs: British Intelligence Iraq Dossier Relied on Recycled Academic Articles
by Glen Rangwala
Below is the text presented by Dr. Rangwala to the House of Commons Select Committee on Foreign Affairs
It was presented in June 2003, in the wake of the invasion and occupation of Iraq
THE PRESENTATION OF THE 30 JANUARY 2003 DOSSIER
\
Oh. That 1.5 percent final solution. You left out the Jews, man. From Kissinger to Wolfowitz et al.
https://open.substack.com/pub/paulokirk/p/a-klan-by-any-other-name-is-judaism?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=5i319
A Klan Named Judaism is a mauling prion, like mad cow disease. Even a blast furnace can't kill it
We must not forget that Powell backed Obama for president. He had no foundational values except to acquire power.