8 Comments
User's avatar
BlazeCloude3's avatar

Can't believe anything of Corporate Media or the Intel Complex of the 'Five Eyes Network'.

Movie, 'Top Gun Maverick' is the basic outline of the bombing in Iran two days ago; thus it's IMPOSSIBLE to claim it to have been ill planned or sloppy...Whatever. It's pretty clear to anybody watching that movie to see the basic strategy to be in the Arsenal Playbook for the Air Force and Marines.

There was much more to this act than theater.

Andy's avatar

Good technical analysis as usual by GR.

Consider that the exact op date 6/22 was set in stone over two years ago (see explanatory post I made a few days before it was executed) so it wouldn’t matter who was president - though agent of chaos Trump is ideal for the role. Also consider that the success of the mission is of no real consequence - it’s a sloppily staged set-piece in a larger play. We could be looking at Nordstream part II via Strait of Hormuz or a false-flag virtually anywhere with the geopolitical aims outlined in the video. The thinking here is that the Cabal would not go through all this trouble to drop a few meaningless bombs. There’ll be the usual insider trading but something larger is afoot…

Gayle Wells's avatar

The confusion is palpable and needs to be examined at a very high level of intelligence. Trump surprising us? Wars waged for years without the people's consent. This Iranian incident seems to be sending us a message of some sort. His NOT causing WWIII as of yet while he had clearly the ability to do so? Why? I'm glad to hear Michel is stating the truth of his confusion. That's important and as we all analyse this together we will get to more truth instead of partisan gymnastics.

dean myers's avatar

SOS for how many thousand years ? Fighting over land other resources etc. and whos psychotic theological belief system is the superior,,, formed while fasting in the sun baked desert for days !!

dean myers's avatar

And talking to smoking plants !!

Fritz Freud's avatar

According to Scott Ritter the strike was meaningless because some facilities have already been bombed by Israel and the others were empty and are still intact.

Scott Ritter also said that these strikes were coordinated by Pacific Command... which is interesting because the head of Pacific Command attended the recent Bilderberg meeting.

If Scott Ritter knows these sites are empty so must the USA and Pacific Command.

So why did they Bomb an empty side?

Even if there was Uranium… it would have contaminated the world.

And that would have led to retaliation on a grand scale.

It don’t make sense unless you consider the provocation to provoke Iran into an excuse for the USA to enter this war.

A classical pre determined False Flag Operation designed to lure the USA into War… WW3

Just like 100 years ago the American public is opposed to war with Iran.

In order to sway public opinion they try to bait Iran to hit a US target like the Nimitz.

The Jewish propaganda media will fuel the public outrage.

And the pendulum swings... the USA will be involved in war... and that forces the regional powers too to get involved... even Russia and China.

That will ensure WW3... a long standing plan of the Jews.

That was what the Jews discussed at the Bilderberg meeting... how to usher in WW3.

The head of Pacific command who is behind these strikes was there:

Paparo, Samuel (USA), Commander, US Indo-Pacific Command

https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/donald-trump-dumb-insane-and-dangerous

dean myers's avatar

SOS for how many thousand years ? Fighting over land other resources etc. and psychotic belief systems formed while fasting in the desert for days !!