28 Comments

This article is cia sponsored obfuscation! Yet another attempt to "divide and conquer by providing tantalizing 'dead ends' that have nothing to do with the real operation.

Expand full comment

These are far more pertinent unanswered questions:

1. If 3,000 people died and 6,000 were injured, why, on the morning of 9/11, did ABC's Cynthia McFadden say in front of Bellevue Hospital emergency entrance "these empty wheelchairs and stretchers say it all" and then in the evening outside the trauma centre set up in West Manhattan say "You can see this parade of ambulances behind me here … we’ve been seeing ambulances coming through all day and rescue vehicles, all of them for the most part empty with the exception of some rescue workers and some other rescuers at the scene."

https://youtu.be/Zw_IfI9BcEw

https://youtu.be/LhGfXPGh5kI

2. Why weren't the recordings of the 118 firefighter "oral histories" published in addition to the "transcripts"? What were the transcripts based on if not the recordings?

https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_WTC_histories_full_03.html

3. Why is there no reference to any of the 343 deaths of their colleagues in the 118 firefighter "oral histories"? (If you find one let me know.)

4. Why do the 118 firefighter "oral histories" contain numerous nonsensicalities, eg, a route to the WTC (located at the southern tip of Manhattan) from the Upper East Side via Second Ave, Houston and West Side Hwy when the east side FDR Dr would be much more convenient especially when there is no southbound turn from Houston.

https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/nonsensicalities-in-the-911-firefighter

5. Why do none of the images of the injured show the signs of serious injury such as burns and the maiming expected in the destruction of two 110-storey buildings after being penetrated by planes which set them alight. https://shorturl.at/nopx2

Expand full comment

Exactly! It's to be expected from a notorious gatekeeping operation though.

Expand full comment

Divide and conquer whom?

Do you work for the CIA, possess the necessary Security Clearance, and have the need-to-know of CIA intelligence operations?

What do you know of the real operation, and how do you know it to be true?

Expand full comment

Pardon the intrusion (never interrupt a decent online quarrel) but I am of the opinion that we can learn something from everyone - even if they are totally wrong.....

Expand full comment

LoL. You’ve reminded me of an old coworker who had a sign above his office door that read,

“Everyone Brings A Little Joy To This Office,

Some By Entering and Some By Exiting.”

Expand full comment

Please excuse me William, I thought, for a moment, that I was in the America of my youth, where one was entitled to their opinions AND the freedom to express them. I will humbly attempt to improve my errant ways.

Expand full comment

I guess the concept of comments in an open public forum for discussion escapes you. Here’s how it works: when you share a comment, expect others to reply to your comment.

Expand full comment

I believe you are confusing the words "discussion" and "attack" No harm done.

Expand full comment

If you equate questions with attacks, then maybe you’re too much of a delicate snowflake to be sharing your opinions in an open forum and not able to defend your opinions when questioned.

Expand full comment

It is clear that the main reason you are on this forum is to provide much needed boosts to your ego. Please seek ego boosters elsewhere. It is NOT working with me. In the stead of being impressed, I feel sorry for you.

Expand full comment

I have researched and studied the events of that infamous day since it happened. I could write a college thesis on it.. What I learned was - The administration in power at that time facilitated the attacks - which were DEW based (Direct Energy Weapons) as well as properly placed suitcase nukes in the sub basement's elevator shafts. The airliners never hit the towers - they were evidently holographic images timed to hit when the smaller strategically placed explosives (thermite) went off. In the French Naudeau brothers video of the initial "strike" you can see a flash just before the nose cone antenna strikes the building. In the video "September Clues" you can see where the CGI failed at least twice - once showing the aluminum nose cone of the airliner coming out of the side of the building... That is impossible..... SPEAKING OF IMPOSSIBLE - various long standing laws of physics were violated that day, one being the towers themselves falling into the path of most resistance instead of the path of LEAST resistance.. IOW the towers SHOULD have leaned over and fallen over, NOT pancaked down into themselves... The collapse times were impossible unless each floor had been wired and the detonation sequence was perfect... Building 7 is the key, IMHO... It was detonated - NO QUESTION - and actually initially EXCEEDED free fall speed(!!).. What is truly scary about the entire series of events is that we have the guy who leased the WTC complex admitting that he told the fire chief to "pull" building 7, yet he walked away with over seven billion dollars in insurance money.. TYhe American people lost so many of their rights that it's hard to comprehend... I could go on and on and on - <sigh> No one seems to care....

Expand full comment

Let me add one last thing - I believe that the attacks served multiple purposes, one of them being the gold stolen from beneath WTC 3(?)..driven off like debris in dump trucks with armed soldiers on each one... Remember the movie "Die Hard With A Vengeance"? BINGO

Expand full comment

OK OK one last thought - the purported hijackers - the one who allegedly flew a modern airliner into the pentagon was kicked out of multiple flight schools with instructors commenting that he "was incapable of flying a Cessna 172" ... the Keanne commission (as someone already mentioned, a cover up) quoted ONE flight instructor who quipped that Hani Hanjour was a "good pilot" ... That lone instructor was employed by Congressional Air and was a former Israeli paratrooper (and likely MOSSAD). he came over a month prior and left a month after 911. The ability to remotely fly an airliner was pioneered by a pentagon based dual citizenship holding Israeli... Israel is deeply connected to this entire operation - as you already know ... Sorry to babble on and on but it is rare that i encounter a forum where can be discussed... thanks for that -

Expand full comment

you are heading in the correct direction however you need to look at ground zero as broadcast - ABC's peter jennings broadcast independent videographer - kevin suttabe's - footage taken at approximately 3:45 showing part of the facade of the south tower lobby still standing - the tallest thing around - a 106 floor 50 thousand pound steel and concrete building cannot collapse into its own footprint and leave the facade of its lobby standing as well as being higher than the nonexistent rubble pile which should be 30 stories tall - vigilantcanadian.ca

Expand full comment

Barbara Honegger – The Pentagon and 9/11

Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015)

https://youtu.be/uZiKOUIpyM8?si=iuP8noB5ZUsRL0vA

Behind The Smoke Curtain: What Happened at the Pentagon on 9/11, and What Didn't, and Why it Matters

https://a.co/d/0KyqMQb

PNAC Wanted a New Pearl Harbor:

https://youtu.be/oxz06SwfnlU

9/11 Files: Dancing Israelis

https://youtu.be/xv5s_VEmZd0?si=YD1KVtYUhwCX9XM_

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11011500/

Expand full comment

you have done a good job of supporting the conspirators though that may not have been your purpose - evidence to support my criticism - vigilantcanadian.ca

Expand full comment

Who’s conspiracy are you referring to?

There would be no conspiracy if “We the People” could see all of the videos from the area surrounding the Pentagon on the morning of 9/11 that show what exactly flew into the side of the Pentagon, because it definitely wasn’t a Boeing 757!

I found this video showing the only two camera angles with video of what is supposed to be a 757 American Airlines FLT 77 going into the Pentagon.

The “aircraft” appears for a split second at 0:05/2:56 in the first camera and at 1:31/2:56 in the second camera.

What appears in both videos is much smaller than a 757 jetliner. Possibly a Global Hawk drone like Barbara shows.

https://youtu.be/0SL2PzzOiF8

PS: Two of my Boeing coworkers were on AA #77 the supposedly went into the Pentagon.

Expand full comment

And so are you ... even if that's not your purpose either. What brought the towers down is of very secondary importance. See my post: https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/911-the-false-dilemma-propaganda

Expand full comment

Commissions or investigatory bodies are appointed to cover-up crimes. This was the case for the Warren Commission when investigating the JFK assassination, inquires into the Oklahoma City bombing, and the 9/11 Commission chaired by political hack Thomas Kean.

The book titled "Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed the World" by Christopher Bollyn connects the nefarious dots.

Expand full comment

If you are sincerely interested in deep truth, take the time and patience to actually read the details in the book by Dr. Judy Wood - "Where Did the Towers Go?' I read every word and studied every photo - it took TIME, but now I know.

Expand full comment

Obfuscation?! Al Qaeda brought down the twin towers

Expand full comment

Independent International Investigative Journalist Christopher Bollyn’s book #Solving911, subtitled “the deception that changed the world,” is THE true source for identifying the “architectural level” criminals who orchestrated the decades-long planned #911FalseFlagAtrocity. And with all due disrespect to the #nefariousNewWorldOrder’s oligarchs, the #FreeingTruth about their compartmentalized #RussianDoll theatrical mass-murderousness will out publicly, eventually.

(References: Bollyn.com; David Talbot’s “The Devil’s Chessboard; Russ Baker’s “Family of Secrets;” John 8:32, IAmTheFaceOfTruth.com; & CorbettReport.com).

Expand full comment

WTC, 9/11?

See first these 4 short videos:

WTC South Tower: left wing of plane behind far building

(It was a matter of "missiles" filled with kerosene, disguised as airplanes with a kind of "hologram" but not made quite good)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hkTjnQ6o18

https://vimeo.com/562690141

CNN Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGVVzrPXRWE

Plane nose pierces the tower?! (but no piece falls down, nothing; bad made "hologram")

3:58 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-oysob5aQ8

And the whole story: No Planes on 9/ 11 Evidences:

(It was a matter of "missiles" filled with kerosene, disguised as airplanes with a kind of "hologram")

https://thedailyjournalist.com/theinvestigative/no-planes-on-911-the-two-minute-video/

Consensus 9/ 11 Best Evidence Panel

https://www.consensus911.org/de/

Expand full comment