11 Comments

OK, this is just one earth science teacher's opinion, but this 'reporting' on electromagnetic waves being used to alter the weather sounds about as believable as a Star Terk episode. For all I know, it WAS a Star Trek Episode..

Expand full comment

suggest you consult official US Air Force Document

https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents/vol3ch15.pdf

Expand full comment

Brilliant. And also the possilbe reason Erdogan recently fell in line with attacking Syria with the USA and Israel. Unleashing an earthquake as a weapon in any country is the new version of showing JFK's assassination in a dark backroom. The fact the earthquake killed not just Turks but also Syrians is notable. Erdogan is a survivor and player of Realpolitck.

Expand full comment

HAARP facilities, like all weaponry and tools of war, can be targeted from above. It is, in the end, a bunch of metal and wires and is a very complex and delicate weapon of war.

Expand full comment

🎯

Expand full comment

it's amazing how many people reject the possibility of weather warfare when the patents and capabilities are all there... https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/you-want-more-proof-of-weather-warfare

Expand full comment

WOW! I've seen conspiracy theories before, but this takes the cake! There wasn't a shred of real science, you know, with formulas, calculations, tables and determinations of cause and effect in the entire piece.

Expand full comment

suggest you consult official US Air Force Document

https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents/vol3ch15.pdf

Expand full comment

Thank you for your post, I hope you will have an opportunity to look the work of Jim Lee - a MAHA candidate for Environment & Natural Resources in the US: https://discourse.nomineesforthepeople.com/t/james-franklin-lee-jr/36083

Here is his substack: https://substack.com/@climateviewer

Michel, perhaps you would entertain an interview with Jim at some point?

Expand full comment

After reading this, "Since the February 2023 earthquakes in Turkey and Syria, several regions of the World have experienced 'extreme weather conditions' and 'climate events' including earthquakes, floods, and wildfires. Were these events the result of environmental modification techniques (ENMOD) and geo-engineering (e.g., Morocco, Libya, Hawaii…)?" I was prompted to share my thoughts on the historical and social dynamics of repression and transformation:

The insecurity described is understandable in a world undergoing rapid changes and increasing social tensions. However, this sentiment can be addressed through individual and collective efforts to foster mental resilience, solidarity, and knowledge. Returning to fundamental values such as intellectual curiosity, community, and purposeful human action offers a realistic path to counter the fear of a metaphorical "zombie apocalypse."

There is reason for hope. As a social scientist, I have learned from history and social science that tyranny has both a beginning and an end.

While societies rarely resort to extreme measures against their leaders, parallels can be found in the natural world. For example, New Scientist reported a striking case in Senegal where chimpanzees killed and cannibalized their former alpha, Foudouko. This rare event sheds light on the dynamics of betrayal and coalition-building.

Dr. Yeadon's observations align with Gustave Le Bon's theories on crowd psychology. In The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind, Le Bon explains that leaders who betray their followers’ trust can trigger intense emotional reactions, leading to impulsive and collective actions.

This phenomenon, referred to as the "Le Bon effect," reflects the social unrest that emerges when prolonged repression stifles a society’s freedom.

History also demonstrates that sustaining strict control through repression, censorship, and surveillance is ultimately unsustainable. Key reasons include:

Economic Strain: Maintaining surveillance and large-scale security infrastructures drains financial resources, diverting them from essential sectors like education and healthcare.

Social Unrest: Persistent repression breeds widespread dissatisfaction, increasing the likelihood of rebellion or resistance.

In recent history, no oppressive regime has endured indefinitely. The combination of public dissatisfaction, economic challenges, and external pressures inevitably forces change.

Over time, these regimes must either adapt or collapse under their inherent instability.

Some governments respond by easing restrictions, implementing reforms, or transitioning to more democratic systems.

South Korea provides an example, evolving from authoritarian rule to democracy in the late 20th century under significant internal and external demands for change. In contrast, regimes that resist adaptation often face sudden and dramatic collapse.

The Soviet Union, for instance, disintegrated due to widespread dissatisfaction and economic decline.

Romania’s history offers another vivid example. Nicolae Ceaușescu's authoritarian regime fell in 1989 during a popular uprising fueled by years of oppression and economic mismanagement.

This collapse highlights how accumulated grievances, declining resources, and external pressures can dismantle even the most entrenched regimes.

History underscores that no tyranny has lasted indefinitely. The pressure to maintain control in the face of growing dissatisfaction, economic hardship, and external challenges ensures that oppressive systems eventually transform through gradual reform or abrupt collapse.

These regimes are inherently unsustainable in the long term.

While some regimes, such as those in China and North Korea, have maintained control for extended periods, their endurance often depends on external factors like geopolitical leverage and internal propaganda rather than fundamental differences.

The inherent pressures of repression inevitably lead to either reform or collapse.

Although regimes like Iran and Syria have persisted for decades, their survival is not guaranteed indefinitely.

Economic hardship, internal dissent, and shifting international dynamics could challenge their hold on power.

History teaches that even the most entrenched tyrannies are ultimately vulnerable to collapse or transformation.

Expand full comment

Luc - idk, King Charles I & II were labelled tyrannical lords and were beheaded, just sayin' when the people come to their sense of empowerment and entitlement, well... and let's just say, of all the name choices the present British Crown could have chosen, he stuck with 'Charles.'

Yes for certain there is a huge emphasis on the atmosphere of keeping people At Most Fear in the media - seems too obvious to me and others who study the climate and the natural vs man made anthropogenic affects as well as the EnMod affects.

When 'things' get hard to prove, even for the 'experts' in the field, well... one can lead to many approaches to conclusions.

Let's hope for the best outcomes of the discussion and discoveries of the likes of Vernadsky or Kepler or Leibniz who Matt Ehret quotes in his book pg 51 "Science Unshackled."

"God has foreseen everything, and for anything that might go wrong, he has provided a remedy in advance."

Expand full comment