Video: Dr. Kary Mullis, the Other “COVID Nobel Prize.” Inventor of PCR “Test” Died in August 2019

Mullis warned us about the misuse of his PCR prior to his death in August 2019

In recent developments, two scientists who pioneered the creation of mRNA vaccine technology were awarded the 2023 Nobel Prize for Medicine. Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman were credited with “helping to change the course of the pandemic.”

This decision of the Nobel Committee is part of the propaganda campaign, i.e. to provide legitimacy and acceptance of the mRNA vaccine. 

Amply documented: The mRNA COVID Jab is best described as a “a killer vaccine” which from the outset in December 2020 has resulted in a worldwide upward movement in mortality and morbidity.  

The evidence amply confirms that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine is a dangerous substance. This is confirmed by the Pfizer Confidential Report released under FOI in October 2021. It comes from the Horse’s Mouth. 

But there is another prominent Nobel Prize Laureate whose name is barely mentioned.

Dr. Kary Mullis who invented the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) “Test” was granted the Nobel Prize in Chemistry (1993).

Dr. Kary Mullis –who passed away just a few months before the outbreak of the alleged Covid-19 pandemic– warned us about the misuse of the PCR.

According to the late Dr. Kary Mullis: The PCR is not a “Test”: 

“The PCR is a process. It does not tell you that you are sick.”

The PCR “Test” cannot detect the identity of the virus, nor can it detect its variants and sub-variants.

The PCR has been deliberately misused to wrongly diagnose COVID and boost the fear campaign.

“To claim that it is meaningful”? … “Those guys have an agenda… “

Dr. Kary Mullis. His legacy will prevail. 

Click here to view the video.

Smoking Gun: The Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) “Test”

“The PCR is a process. It does not tell you that you are sick.” –Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Laureate and Inventor of the RT-PCR, passed away in August 2019.

“…All or a substantial part of these positives could be due to what’s called false positives tests.” –Dr. Michael Yeadon, distinguished scientist, former Vice President and Chief Science Officer of Pfizer

“This misuse of the RT-PCR technique is applied as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governments to justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights, … under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients.” –Dr. Pascal Sacré, Belgian physician specialized in critical care and renowned public health analyst.

The slanted methodology applied under WHO guidance for detecting the alleged spread of the virus is the Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test, which has been routinely applied all over the world since February 2020.

The RT-PCR test has been used worldwide to generate millions of erroneous “COVID-19 confirmed cases”, which are then used to sustain the illusion that the alleged pandemic is real.

This assessment based on erroneous numbers has been used in the course of the last three years to spearhead and sustain the fear campaign.

And people are now led to believe that the COVID-19 “vaccine” is the “solution.” And that “normality” will be restored once the entire population of planet Earth has been vaccinated.

“Confirmed” is a misnomer. A “confirmed RT-PCR positive case” does not imply a “COVID-19 confirmed case.”

“Positive RT-PCR is not synonymous with the COVID-19 disease! PCR specialists make it clear that a test must always be compared with the clinical record of the patient being tested, with the patient’s state of health to confirm its value [reliability].” (Dr. Pascal Sacré)

The procedure used by the national health authorities is to categorize all RT-PCR positive cases as “COVID-19 confirmed cases” (with or without a medical diagnosis). Ironically, this routine process of identifying “confirmed cases” is in derogation of the CDC’s own guidelines:

“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms. The performance of this test has not been established for monitoring treatment of 2019-nCoV infection. This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.”

The methodology used to detect and estimate the spread of the virus is flawed and invalid.

False Positives

The earlier debate at the outset of the crisis focused on the issue of “false positives.” Acknowledged by the WHO and the CDC, the RT-PCR test was known to produce a high percentage of false positives. According to Dr. Pascal Sacré:

“Today, as authorities test more people, there are bound to be more positive RT-PCR tests. This does not mean that COVID-19 is coming back, or that the epidemic is moving in waves. There are more people being tested, that’s all.”

The debate on false positives (acknowledged by health authorities) points to so-called errors without necessarily questioning the overall validity of the RT-PCR test as a means to detecting the alleged spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

The PCR Test Does Not Detect the Identity of the Virus

The RT-PCR test does not identify/detect the virus. What the PCR test identifies are genetic fragments of numerous viruses (including influenza viruses types A and B and coronaviruses which trigger common colds).

The results of the RT-PCR test cannot “confirm” whether an individual who undertakes the test is infected with SARS-CoV-2.

All that is required is the presence of “viral genetic material” for it to be categorized as “positive”. The procedure does not identify or isolate SARS-COV-2. What appears in the tests are fragments of the virus.

[Excerpts from Chapter III of Michel Chossudovsky‘s book entitled: The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d’Etat Against Humanity.  Click here to download.]